2016
DOI: 10.1086/687476
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Supply and Demand Framework for Two-Sided Matching Markets

Abstract: We propose a new model of two-sided matching markets, which allows for complex heterogeneous preferences, but is more tractable than the standard model, yielding rich comparative statics and new results on large matching markets. We simplify the standard Gale and Shapley (1962) model in two ways. First, following Aumann (1964) we consider a setting where a finite number of agents on one side (colleges or firms) are matched to a continuum mass of agents on the other side (students or workers). Second, we show t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
83
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 208 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
(106 reference statements)
2
83
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We also identify a condition under which a side‐optimal stable matching can be found via a generalized Gale–Shapley algorithm. Finally, we also find a condition, richness , that guarantees the uniqueness of the stable matching, thus generalizing the uniqueness result of Azevedo and Leshno () beyond the special case of responsive preferences. When firms have responsive preferences but face general group‐specific quotas (e.g., affirmative actions), our richness condition is implied by a full support assumption on firms' preferences, leading to a unique stable matching under that assumption.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We also identify a condition under which a side‐optimal stable matching can be found via a generalized Gale–Shapley algorithm. Finally, we also find a condition, richness , that guarantees the uniqueness of the stable matching, thus generalizing the uniqueness result of Azevedo and Leshno () beyond the special case of responsive preferences. When firms have responsive preferences but face general group‐specific quotas (e.g., affirmative actions), our richness condition is implied by a full support assumption on firms' preferences, leading to a unique stable matching under that assumption.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…While the set of stable matchings can be large in finite economies, there is a sense in which the set shrinks as the market grows large. Indeed, Azevedo and Leshno () established that a stable matching is generically unique in a continuum economy when firms have so‐called responsive preferences, a special case of substitutable preferences. To what extent such a result applies to more general preferences is an interesting issue that can be explored in a large market setting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Lee (2011) introduces cardinal utilities which are chosen at random within a fixed interval, and measures the size of the core in these cardinal utility units. 1 Azevedo and Leshno (2012) consider a many-to-one setting with a constant number of schools on one side, and an increasing number of students, modeling the limit as having a continuum of students. Bodoh-Creed (2013) also studies a continuum of agents, using a type-space to describe their characteristics.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%