2017
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A super-Earth orbiting the nearby M dwarf GJ 536

Abstract: We report the discovery of a super-Earth orbiting the star GJ 536 based on the analysis of the radial-velocity time series from the HARPS and HARPS-N spectrographs. GJ 536 b is a planet with a minimum mass M sin i of 5.36 ± 0.69 M ⊕ ; it has an orbital period of 8.7076 ± 0.0025 days at a distance of 0.066610(13) AU, and an orbit that is consistent with circular. The host star is the moderately quiet M1 V star GJ 536, located at 10 pc from the Sun. We find the presence of a second signal at 43 days that we rela… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rotation periods estimated according to the formalism described in this Appendix, plotted against the rotation periods for a sample of FGK stars with known values for P rot . Black symbols correspond to stars from Noyes et al (1984) and cyan symbols to stars from Suárez Mascareño et al (2015). The dashed lines mark the interval ±5 days with respect to the diagonal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rotation periods estimated according to the formalism described in this Appendix, plotted against the rotation periods for a sample of FGK stars with known values for P rot . Black symbols correspond to stars from Noyes et al (1984) and cyan symbols to stars from Suárez Mascareño et al (2015). The dashed lines mark the interval ±5 days with respect to the diagonal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of M-dwarfs, due to the huge number of line blends, the cross correlation function is not Gaussian resulting in a less precise RV measurement and in a loss of sensitivity to the changes in the full width half maximum (FWHM) of the CCF. For this type of stars we opted to do a different modelling of the cross correlation function, using the combination of a second order polynomial with a Gaussian function over a 15 km s −1 window centred at the minimum of the CCF following Suárez Mascareño et al (2017). The center of the Gaussian function is taken as our radial velocity measurement.…”
Section: Radial Velocitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This therefore needs to be kept in mind when attempting to compare absolute values with other works. We focus our analysis on long-term variability rather than on variability at the rotational timescale, as has been done by Suárez Mascareño et al (2017), and we also study a much larger sample. We note we focus here on the line shifts and not on the asymmetries of the lines that are due to convection or other effects such as rotation (Gray 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%