1975
DOI: 10.1088/0031-8949/11/3-4/019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Summary of the International Conference on Hyperfine Interactions Studied by Nuclear Reactions and Decay

Abstract: Without abstract; see full text

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1976
1976
1985
1985

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the experiment described below, a positive sign of the g-factor has been determined: g=0.282(6). This value is in good agreement with the predicted gfactor for the configuration {reds/2 X (1148n, 7 )}19/2 proposed by Bron [2]; gcalcWat~d= +0.29 for g(~ds/2) = 1.38 and g(~ 14Sn, 7-)= -0.10 [3]. In our experiment, which was of the TDPAD type, we used the 113In(c42nT) reaction with 28 MeV :~'s burstsuppression by an internal deflection system has been applied in order to obtain an interval of 1 laS between the bursts.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…In the experiment described below, a positive sign of the g-factor has been determined: g=0.282(6). This value is in good agreement with the predicted gfactor for the configuration {reds/2 X (1148n, 7 )}19/2 proposed by Bron [2]; gcalcWat~d= +0.29 for g(~ds/2) = 1.38 and g(~ 14Sn, 7-)= -0.10 [3]. In our experiment, which was of the TDPAD type, we used the 113In(c42nT) reaction with 28 MeV :~'s burstsuppression by an internal deflection system has been applied in order to obtain an interval of 1 laS between the bursts.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…The relative intensities of the delayed gamma rays are given in Table 3 a. It should now be observed that this scheme suggests the following intensity relation of delayed gamma rays: [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30](1 + ~) =11.536 +11,438 +I1,1 54.+11.252 =/tot" Since none of the high energy gamma rays can have a higher multipolarity than E3, the conversion electron intensities can be neglected. From Table 3a it is found that:…”
Section: B) Transitions Indicating the 27/2-levelmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…in second column of the table), only a rough estimate of the experimental value gexp is obtained. This procedure has been carried out for the 73keV 3 + state in 13SLa, using as empirical values g(137La; 7/2+), g(~39La; 7/2+), g(~37Ba; 3/2+), g(~39Ce; 3/2 +) and -since no g-factor measurements are available for 5/2 + states in 137'139La or for 1/2 + states in lSVBa or 139Ce g(~41Pr; 5/2 +) and g(129Xe; 1/2 +) 51 [14]. These interactions can be approximately taken into account, if experimental g-factors of adjacent oddmass nuclei are used as empirical values instead of the single-particle values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%