Operations Research/Computer Science Interfaces Series
DOI: 10.1007/0-306-48109-x_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Summary and Illustration of Disjunctive Decomposition with Set Convexification

Abstract: Keywords:In this paper we review the Disjunctive Decomposition algorithm for two-stage Stochastic Mixed Integer Programs (SMIP). This novel method uses principles of disjunctive programming to develop cuttingplane-based approximations of the feasible set of the second stage problem. At the core of this approach is the Common Cut Coefficient Theorem, which provides a mechanism for transforming cuts derived for one outcome of the second stage problem into cuts that are valid for other outcomes. An illustrative a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Disjunctive decomposition (D 2 ) (Sen et al, 2002, Sen andHigle, 2005) takes advantage of the ideas from disjunctive programming (Balas, 1975, Blair and Jeroslow, 1978, Sherali and Shetty, 1980 and reverse convex programming (Sen and Sherali, 1987) to provide a rather general setting for the study of the convex hull of feasible points of SIP problems under the two-stage setting. Sen and Higle (2005) develop a cutting-planebased approximation of the feasible set of the second-stage problem (2) under the fixed recourse property.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disjunctive decomposition (D 2 ) (Sen et al, 2002, Sen andHigle, 2005) takes advantage of the ideas from disjunctive programming (Balas, 1975, Blair and Jeroslow, 1978, Sherali and Shetty, 1980 and reverse convex programming (Sen and Sherali, 1987) to provide a rather general setting for the study of the convex hull of feasible points of SIP problems under the two-stage setting. Sen and Higle (2005) develop a cutting-planebased approximation of the feasible set of the second-stage problem (2) under the fixed recourse property.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The D 2 algorithm is derived in [17] and illustrated in [16]. In the D 2 algorithm the scenario subproblem LP relaxation takes the following form:…”
Section: The D 2 Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several surveys on algorithms for SMIP (Schultz et al, 1996, Klein Haneveld and van der Vlerk, 1999, Louveaux and Schultz, 2003, Schultz, 2003, Sen, 2005) and a few textbooks are available (Birge and Louveaux, 1997, Ruszczyn'ski and Shapiro, 2003, Shapiro et al, 2009. Closely related cutting plane methods for SMIP include the method by Carøe and Tind (1997), Carøe (1998) and the disjunctive decomposition (D2) method (Sen et al, 2002, Sen andHigle, 2005). Both methods are based on disjunctive programming (Balas, 1975, Blair and Jeroslow, 1978, Sherali and Shetty, 1980 and provide a rather general setting for the study of the convex hull of feasible points of SMIP problems under the two-stage setting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%