2017
DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/12/10/c10009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A suite of diagnostics to validate and optimize the prototype ITER neutral beam injector

Abstract: in the present paper with a focus on their rationale, key solutions and most original and effective implementations. K: Beam-line instrumentation (beam position and profile monitors; beam-intensity monitors; bunch length monitors); Plasma diagnostics -interferometry, spectroscopy and imaging; Beam dynamics; Ion sources (positive ions, negative ions, electron cyclotron resonance (ECR), electron beam (EBIS))

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After a shutdown started at the end of November 2018, including the installation of the plasma grid mask, SPIDER operations resumed at mid-April 2019 and were devoted to the following activities: characterisation of the RF circuits; characterisation of the ion source; test of the extraction and accelerator power supplies; first characterisation of the SPIDER beam. As of 2019 most of SPIDER diagnostic systems 18 are operating: the list of source diagnostics 19 include source emission spectroscopy, surface and calorimetry thermocouples, Halpha detectors, visible cameras and electrical measurements at the various power supplies. The electrostatic sensors embedded in the plasma grid and in the bias plate 20 are under commissioning; the diagnostic systems more tightly related with caesium operation, like laser absorption spectroscopy 21 and cavity ring-down spectroscopy, will soon be installed and commissioned.…”
Section: Iib Source and Beam Characterisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After a shutdown started at the end of November 2018, including the installation of the plasma grid mask, SPIDER operations resumed at mid-April 2019 and were devoted to the following activities: characterisation of the RF circuits; characterisation of the ion source; test of the extraction and accelerator power supplies; first characterisation of the SPIDER beam. As of 2019 most of SPIDER diagnostic systems 18 are operating: the list of source diagnostics 19 include source emission spectroscopy, surface and calorimetry thermocouples, Halpha detectors, visible cameras and electrical measurements at the various power supplies. The electrostatic sensors embedded in the plasma grid and in the bias plate 20 are under commissioning; the diagnostic systems more tightly related with caesium operation, like laser absorption spectroscopy 21 and cavity ring-down spectroscopy, will soon be installed and commissioned.…”
Section: Iib Source and Beam Characterisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SPIDER goal includes the validation of the design of ITER NBI support plants: cooling plant, removing thermal power (10MW) from power supplies, ion source, and beam dump [15]; central Instrumentation and Control systems (I&C) [16], providing conventional control (CODAS, Control and Data Acquisition System) [17], personnel protection (Central safety System) [18], investment protection (Central Interlock System, CIS) [19], managing also breakdowns in between the acceleration grids). SPIDER is equipped with a large set of diagnostic systems performing the measurements of the significant physics quantities [20]: thermocouples mounted on ion source, vacuum vessel and beam dump, flow and pressure sensors, electrostatic probes, emission and absorption spectroscopy, plasma light, visible and infrared cameras, beam tomography, neutron monitoring, cavity ring-down spectroscopy, STRIKE (Short-Time Retractable Instrumented Kalorimeter Experiment). Lines-of-sight (LoSs) observing the inside of the source through each of the drivers are used both for source emission spectroscopy and for total light emission [21].…”
Section: Spidermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measuring the divergence of these ion beams is a challenge because of their high power density, large size, and overlapping beamlets. Diagnostics for doing so at full power and duration are by necessity spatially averaged measurements: either Beam Emission Spectroscopy (BES) observing a line of sight [13]; or beam dump calorimetry, where the beam footprint can be measured with a typical resolution of several centimetres at a position several metres from the grid system [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%