2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijome.2013.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A suitable metocean hindcast database for the design of Marine energy converters

Abstract: Resource assessment as well as characterisation of site climatologies for the design of Marine Energy Converters requires data bases allowing an accurate description of the environmental forcing, especially waves and sea-states, on a high resolution grid. As a support to its research activities related to the development of marine renewable energies, Ifremer is building a specific hindcast data set for the assessment of sea-states climatologies. The main features of this database, built running an up-to-date c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
83
1
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
6
83
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Peak periods (not illustrated here) ranged from 8 to 18 s (around 10 s on average). Even during "calm" periods, H S values are generally no lower than 0.8 m. Figure 2a illustrates the ability of the model of Boudière et al [35] to describe H S over the period, with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.24 cm and a R 2 of 0.95. Measured and modelled T S and S S are illustrated in Figure 2b Model results are compared with AWAC measurements in terms of (a) significant wave height, (b) surface temperature, (c) surface salinity, current direction ((d,e), respectively), and current intensity ((f,g), respectively).…”
Section: Hydrodynamic Validation Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Peak periods (not illustrated here) ranged from 8 to 18 s (around 10 s on average). Even during "calm" periods, H S values are generally no lower than 0.8 m. Figure 2a illustrates the ability of the model of Boudière et al [35] to describe H S over the period, with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.24 cm and a R 2 of 0.95. Measured and modelled T S and S S are illustrated in Figure 2b Model results are compared with AWAC measurements in terms of (a) significant wave height, (b) surface temperature, (c) surface salinity, current direction ((d,e), respectively), and current intensity ((f,g), respectively).…”
Section: Hydrodynamic Validation Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Initial & boundary conditions (3D velocities, temperature, salinity) GLORYS global ocean reanalysis [34] Wave (Significant height, peak period, bottom excursion and orbital velocities) WaveWatch III hindcast [35] Meteorological conditions (Atmospheric pressure, wind, temperature, relative humidity, cloud cover) ARPEGE model [36] Tide (14 components) FES2004 solution [37] River discharge (flow and SSC) Daily runoff data (French freshwater office)…”
Section: Forcing Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…WW3 is used with a spatial resolution of about 1.5 km and its spectral resolution corresponds to 32 frequencies ranging from 0.0373 to 0.7159 Hz and 24 points for the propagation direction (every 15 • ). At open boundaries, WW3 is forced by 3-hourly energy spectra from the HOMERE hindcast database (Boudière et al, 2013). The atmospheric roughness length is estimated from the Charnock parameter supplied by WW3 (Eq.…”
Section: Mesonh-mars3d-wavewatch IIImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This database has been performed using the numerical wave model WaveWatchIII® (WW3) version 4.09 (BOUDIERE et al, 2013). WW3 is a third generation spectral wave model based on the conservation equation for the density of wave action.…”
Section: Long Term Numerical Dataset (Ltnd)mentioning
confidence: 99%