The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2018
DOI: 10.4172/2151-6219.1000348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Suitable Business Model for Bank Branches: Combining Business Model and Malmquist Productivity Index (MPI)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The objective of this differentiation is to gain competitive advantage or better performance. For example, better business model helped banks to increase the productivity in all its branches in Iran (Karimi et al 2018) and similarly innovativeness in value creation and customer co-creation has a positive effect on customer satisfaction (Clauss et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objective of this differentiation is to gain competitive advantage or better performance. For example, better business model helped banks to increase the productivity in all its branches in Iran (Karimi et al 2018) and similarly innovativeness in value creation and customer co-creation has a positive effect on customer satisfaction (Clauss et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Malmquist productivity index (MPI) is a common method for measuring changes in productivity over time and was introduced by Malmquist [36,37]. It was developed as a DEA model by Fare et al [38,39]. MPI can be divided into technical efficiency change index (TECI) and technical change index (TCI) using a distance function without assuming a specific production function.…”
Section: Malmquist Productivity Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different admission control criteria have been proposed. In this paper, the equivalent capacity C est is used (Karimi et al, 2018), since this criterion is based on PBAC mechanism. PBAC is used because of its ease of implementation.…”
Section: Admission Control Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each DMU j has m distinct inputs, given as ( ) The cross-efficiency of the DEA is a traditional development in the two-step process. More precisely, in step 1, the self-evaluation efficiency of each DMU is calculated based on the DEA model of Copper Charnes Rhodes (CCR) (Karimi et al, 2018). In step 2, the weights obtained from step 1 are applied to all the other DMUs in order to achieve a score which is referred to as the crossefficiency evaluation score (Karimi et al, 2018).…”
Section: Cross-efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation