1990
DOI: 10.2307/2684359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Suggestion for Using Powerful and Informative Tests of Normality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
472
0
6

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 666 publications
(480 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
472
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Outliers were identified using the Median Absolute Deviation Method [39] and transformed to reduce their impact on analyses. Univariate normality was assessed using the D'Agostino-Pearson Omnibus Test [40], while multivariate normality was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk Multivariate test [41], available in R Version 3.0.1 [42]. Non-normal distributions, including the composite scores, were transformed using Naperian log transformation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outliers were identified using the Median Absolute Deviation Method [39] and transformed to reduce their impact on analyses. Univariate normality was assessed using the D'Agostino-Pearson Omnibus Test [40], while multivariate normality was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk Multivariate test [41], available in R Version 3.0.1 [42]. Non-normal distributions, including the composite scores, were transformed using Naperian log transformation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Univariate statistics for normally distributed continuous covariates (ie, age) were assessed by two-way ANOVA for differences by primary tumour site among cases and by the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test when not normally distributed, with normality determined by the skewness-kurtosis test. 22 Categorical differences by site were assessed by Fisher's exact test. All tests were two-sided and significance was considered where p≤0.05.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5). Size classes 1 + 2 and 3 in Tragamón showed a signiWcant negative association at inter-tree distances of 4.5-9 m, according to the spatial Table 2 Parameters of DBH distributions, test results for skewness and kurtosis (D'Agostino et al 1990) and adjusted Weibull models Capital letters in Tragamón and Caviedes correspond to the components of DBH distributions displayed in Fig. 1.…”
Section: Spatial Associationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…DBH distribution analysis DBH data in each stand was tested for normality with the robust and powerful D'Agostino third (qb 1 ) and fourth (b 2 ) moment tests, which test for deviations from normality associated with skewness and kurtosis, respectively (D'Agostino et al 1990). The null hypotheses are a skewness of 0 and a kurtosis of 3.…”
Section: Field Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%