1993
DOI: 10.1016/0148-9062(93)92733-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A suggested improvement to the Schmidt rebound hardness ISRM suggested method with particular reference to rock machineability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
20
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Schmidt hammer readings were taken at set intervals across the entire platform and the rock surfaces were prepared using a carborundum wheel prior to testing, with a minimum of 10 readings being taken with each hammer at each site. Data were corrected for angle (Day and Goudie, 1977), and anomalously low values rejected on the basis of Chauvenet's criterion (Göktan and Ayday, 1993). Only low values were subject to this test, as it is mechanically impossible to obtain an erroneously high value (Göktan and Ayday, 1993).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Schmidt hammer readings were taken at set intervals across the entire platform and the rock surfaces were prepared using a carborundum wheel prior to testing, with a minimum of 10 readings being taken with each hammer at each site. Data were corrected for angle (Day and Goudie, 1977), and anomalously low values rejected on the basis of Chauvenet's criterion (Göktan and Ayday, 1993). Only low values were subject to this test, as it is mechanically impossible to obtain an erroneously high value (Göktan and Ayday, 1993).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data were corrected for angle (Day and Goudie, 1977), and anomalously low values rejected on the basis of Chauvenet's criterion (Göktan and Ayday, 1993). Only low values were subject to this test, as it is mechanically impossible to obtain an erroneously high value (Göktan and Ayday, 1993).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ISRM [2] Registrar 20 valores de impactos simples de rebote separados por al menos un diámetro de la aguja, y promediar los 10 más altos valores. Goktan R.M., Ayday C. [3] Registrar 20 valores de impactos simples de rebote separados por al menos un diámetro de la aguja. Desechar valores según el criterio de Chauvenet, y promediar las lecturas restantes.…”
Section: Autor(es) Procedimiento Del Ensayounclassified
“…Prior to statistical analysis all anomalous R−values were removed on the basis of Chauvenet's criterion recommended in the interpretation of SHRT by Göktan and Ayday (1993). To test the significance of differences between R−values mea− sured along coastal and more inland roche moutonnée surfaces, a Cochran and Cox test was applied.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%