“…61 studies reported uptake of different community-based testing approaches among 713,632 participants: seven studies evaluated index testing among 12,052 participants [29],[30],[41]–[46], three evaluated self-testing among 1,839 participants [47]–[49], 14 evaluated mobile HTC among 79,475 participants [26],[28],[50]–[59], 28 evaluated door-to-door testing among 555,267 participants [24],[25],[28],[30],[60]–[81], six evaluated workplace HTC among 62,406 participants [22],[82]–[86], and three evaluated school-based HTC among 2,593 participants [87]–[89] (Figure 2). The percentage of participants accepting HTC was 88.2% for index testing (95% confidence interval [CI] 80.5%–95.9%; I
2 99.7%, 95% CI 99.7%–99.8%; Figure 3), 87.1% for self-testing (95% CI 85.1%–89.0%; I
2 28.8%, 95% CI 0%–92.6%; Figure 4), 86.8% for mobile HTC (95% CI 85.6%–88.1%; I
2 99.9%, 95% CI 99.9%–99.9%; Figure 5), 80.0% for door-to-door HTC (95% CI 76.9%–83.1%; I
2 99.9%, 95% CI 99.9%–99.9%; Figure 6), 67.4% for workplace HTC (95% CI 32.8%–100.0%; I
2 100%, 100.0%–100.0%; Figure 7), and 62.1% for school-based HTC (95% CI 39.6%–84.5%; I
2 99.0%, 95% CI 98.5%–99.4%; Figure 8).…”