2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17214.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A submillimetre survey of the kinematics of the Perseus molecular cloud - II. Molecular outflows

Abstract: We present a census of molecular outflows across four active regions of star formation in the Perseus molecular cloud (NGC 1333, IC348/HH211, L1448 and L1455), totalling an area of over 1000 arcmin 2 . This is one of the largest surveys of outflow evolution in a single molecular cloud published to date. We analyse large-scale, sensitive CO J = 3 → 2 data sets from the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope, including new data towards NGC 1333. Where possible we make use of our complementary 13 CO and C 18 O data to cor… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

39
207
2
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(249 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
39
207
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This appears to be consistent with the scales observed in low-mass star-forming regions (e.g. as seen in velocity channel maps in NGC 1333, Quillen et al 2005;Curtis et al 2010). However, Cygnus X forms a large number of highmass stars, which are expected to drive more energetic and most likely larger outflows compared to their model.…”
Section: Fcrao 13 Co 1→0 Datasupporting
confidence: 74%
“…This appears to be consistent with the scales observed in low-mass star-forming regions (e.g. as seen in velocity channel maps in NGC 1333, Quillen et al 2005;Curtis et al 2010). However, Cygnus X forms a large number of highmass stars, which are expected to drive more energetic and most likely larger outflows compared to their model.…”
Section: Fcrao 13 Co 1→0 Datasupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Therefore, the mass of the warm gas traced by our mid-J CO observations is not significantly different (considering the errors and different calculation methods) with respect to mass inferred with low-J CO transitions. The major discrepancy is with the CO (3−2) estimations of Curtis et al (2010). However, accounting for the opacity effects that these authors took into account, but also the different velocity range of the integrated maps (Curtis et al 2010 considered velocities from 2 km s −1 away from the cloud velocity, while our maps include emission only from ∼5 km s −1 away from the cloud velocity), we found that the results would be similar (in total a factor of ∼3 × 1.3 higher than the value reported without accounting for those effects for the opacity and velocity range).…”
Section: Outflow Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, accounting for the opacity effects that these authors took into account, but also the different velocity range of the integrated maps (Curtis et al 2010 considered velocities from 2 km s −1 away from the cloud velocity, while our maps include emission only from ∼5 km s −1 away from the cloud velocity), we found that the results would be similar (in total a factor of ∼3 × 1.3 higher than the value reported without accounting for those effects for the opacity and velocity range). Similarly, CO (2−1) observations of the IRS3 outflow (Kwon et al 2006) and CO (3−2) observations of the HH211 outflow (Curtis et al 2010) reported mass estimates of 0.003 M and 0.009 M , respectively, which are similar within the errors to our results based on the CO (6−5) emission (see Table 7). A previous study by van Kempen et al (2009a) in the low-mass outflow HH46 has shown the same trend, i.e., that when considering the errors and difference in the mass estimation method, low-J and mid-J CO lines yield similar results in the mass calculations.…”
Section: Outflow Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is the case for the outflows in the Perseus cloud (NGC 1333, L1448, HH211, L1455, e.g. Curtis et al 2010;Gomez-Ruiz et al 2013). The conclusion is that either BHR71 is indeed more energetic than its low-mass counterparts, or that our method partly based on shock modelling naturally yields higher numbers than in all these studies, that often make use of fewer CO lines, for instance, than in the present work.…”
Section: Employing Shock Models: Energeticsmentioning
confidence: 99%