2018
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aadc63
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Submillimeter Perspective on the GOODS Fields (SUPER GOODS). III. A Large Sample of ALMA Sources in the GOODS-S

Abstract: We analyze the > 4σ sources in the most sensitive 100 arcmin 2 area (rms < 0.56 mJy) of a SCUBA-2 850 µm survey of the GOODS-S and present the 75 band 7 ALMA sources (> 4.5σ) obtained from high-resolution interferometric follow-up observations. The SCUBA-2-and hence ALMA-samples should be complete to 2.25 mJy. Of the 53 SCUBA-2 sources in this complete sample, only five have no ALMA detections, while 13% (68% confidence range 7-19%) have multiple ALMA counterparts. Colorbased high-redshift dusty galaxy selecti… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
128
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 120 publications
13
128
2
Order By: Relevance
“…with the majority at z 3. On the other hand, the median redshift of 850-µm detected 450-µm sources is z = 2.30 +0.27 −0.26 with a 16th to 84th percentile range of 1.6 to 3.0, which is in good agreement with previous studies of 850-µm sources (Simpson et al , 2017Dunlop et al 2017;Cowie et al 2018). To gain insight into the redshift distribution of our entire sample, we assume that the 46 sources without 24-µm or radio identifications are at a median redshift of z = 3 ( §3.3).…”
Section: Redshift Distributionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…with the majority at z 3. On the other hand, the median redshift of 850-µm detected 450-µm sources is z = 2.30 +0.27 −0.26 with a 16th to 84th percentile range of 1.6 to 3.0, which is in good agreement with previous studies of 850-µm sources (Simpson et al , 2017Dunlop et al 2017;Cowie et al 2018). To gain insight into the redshift distribution of our entire sample, we assume that the 46 sources without 24-µm or radio identifications are at a median redshift of z = 3 ( §3.3).…”
Section: Redshift Distributionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…We note that the sub-millimeter catalogs used in these works are biased toward brighter SMGs, since their catalogs are all from single-dish submillimeter surveys that have a typical angular resolution of 10 -20 and require radio counterparts. On the other hand, our estimated AGN fraction is more consistent with the ALMA-based estimate from ALESS (17 +16 −6 %; Wang et al 2013), ALMA follow-up observations in S2CLS UDS program AS2UDS (8-28%; Stach et al 2019), and ALMA follow-up observations in SCUBA-2 850-µm survey (∼ 6%; Cowie et al 2018). A trend of higher AGN fraction for SMG population with brighter 870-µm flux density was previously observed , which would imply that brighter SMGs are more likely to host AGNs.…”
Section: Agn Contaminationsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…CDFS from Cowie et al (2018), which show a similar trend. We note that there are 108 SMGs in our sample that are undetected in the K-band (K > 25.7).…”
Section: Comparing Observed and Magphys-derived Quantitiessupporting
confidence: 54%
“…On the other hand, the more interesting question is perhaps why the A V values agree in the lower infrared luminosity end, despite the spatial mismatches. Based on da Cunha et al (2008Cunha et al ( , 2015, magphys adopts a two-component model (birth cloud and diffuse ISM) to describe the attenuation of stellar emission at the UV-to-NIR regime. Since the UV-to-NIR emissions largely originate from the stars in the diffuse ISM, by increasing the attenuation in the birth clouds, it is possible to boost the infrared luminosity without significantly increasing the total attenuation, which is A V .…”
Section: Comparison To the Energy Balance Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%