2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2008.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A submaximal test to assess back muscle capacity: Evaluation of construct validity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Inability to maintain a given position likely indicates fatigue-related contraction failure, which suggests that back muscle fatigue occurred earlier and to a stronger extent in the younger and particularly male cLBP participants. Whereas such between-group differences might be assumed to confound a SEMG signal with a small signal to noise ratio (high noise), as this was the case in low force back extensions (Lariviere et al 2002a;Lariviere et al 2009), the signal to noise ratio was high in our back extensions that were close to a maximum. Consequently, it can be concluded that the differences in trunk inclination changes with the duration of the sustained contractions were unlikely confounded by noise, and thus the group comparisons of the SEMG fatigue changes can be relied upon.…”
Section: Methodological Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Inability to maintain a given position likely indicates fatigue-related contraction failure, which suggests that back muscle fatigue occurred earlier and to a stronger extent in the younger and particularly male cLBP participants. Whereas such between-group differences might be assumed to confound a SEMG signal with a small signal to noise ratio (high noise), as this was the case in low force back extensions (Lariviere et al 2002a;Lariviere et al 2009), the signal to noise ratio was high in our back extensions that were close to a maximum. Consequently, it can be concluded that the differences in trunk inclination changes with the duration of the sustained contractions were unlikely confounded by noise, and thus the group comparisons of the SEMG fatigue changes can be relied upon.…”
Section: Methodological Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Moreover, EMG values such as RMS and MdPF showed no influence of fatigue, for example increasing RMS or decreasing MdPF49, 50 ) . A previous study reported that healthy male subjects could repeat isometric trunk extension at 40%MVC of force more than 50 times, with 8-second cycles (1.5 seconds of progressive rise to reach the target force, 5 seconds to sustain this force level, and 1.5 seconds of rest)51 ) . In Experiment 1 of this study, subjects rested sufficiently between trials so they should not have been tired.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During these perturbation trials, subjects were asked to maintain constant extension torques, consistent with previous studies that have quantified the reflexive contribution to lumbar stability with the use of back muscle pre-tensioning (Hendershot et al, 2011;Moorhouse and Granata, 2007). Torque levels of 15 N m for males, and 10 N m for females were chosen as they are 5% of maximal levels (Larivière et al, 2002(Larivière et al, , 2014a(Larivière et al, , 2006(Larivière et al, , 2009. Subjects were aided with real-time feedback of their torque filtered at 15 Hz.…”
Section: Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%