2018
DOI: 10.4038/jula.v21i1.7911
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Study to Examine the Level of Usage and Awareness of National Library of Medicine Classification (NLMC) System in Health/Medical Libraries in Sri Lanka and Factors Associated in Adopting it

Abstract: The National Library of Medicine classification system is a library classification system which covers the field of medicine and preclinical sciences. It is recognized as a standard classification system which can be used in Health and Medical libraries all over the world. Since it is specially designed for the field of health sciences, most of the health libraries in other countries have adopted it for classifying books. However, not many Sri Lankan Health and Medical libraries have adopted this system yet. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
(1 reference statement)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 2 shows that CMLs is not always an isolated person but an important figure and that the link between CMLs and his services and the clinical team seems to work well. (Shokraneh, 2015;Sullo & Gomes, 2016;Swanberg et al, 2016;Dilhani & Ranasinghe, 2018) Lack of proper and sustainable workshops and training programs (Swanberg et al, 2016) Failure to identify the urgent need for a series of degree courses and professional programs on CML (Ma et al, 2018) Lack of focus on EBM education (Blake & Ballance, 2013) Less proficiency in librarians and specialists (Sullo & Gomes, 2016) Familiarity with the clinical environment of librarians (Cruse & Protzko, 2014) Lack of medical terminology awareness Murphy & Boden, 2015;Perrier et al, 2014) 02. Cultural Personal Librarians have low self esteem (Murphy & Boden, 2015) Negative attitude of medical staff towards hospital librarians (Reid, 2011;Murphy & Boden, 2015;Perrier et al, 2014) Negative attitude of hospital management towards clinical librarians (Beschnett & Bulger, 2013;Butson & Pauly, 2013;Cooper & Crum, 2013) (Cruse & Protzko, 2014) Poor interpersonal relationships (between clinical librarians and medical teams) (Murphy & Boden, 2015) 03.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2 shows that CMLs is not always an isolated person but an important figure and that the link between CMLs and his services and the clinical team seems to work well. (Shokraneh, 2015;Sullo & Gomes, 2016;Swanberg et al, 2016;Dilhani & Ranasinghe, 2018) Lack of proper and sustainable workshops and training programs (Swanberg et al, 2016) Failure to identify the urgent need for a series of degree courses and professional programs on CML (Ma et al, 2018) Lack of focus on EBM education (Blake & Ballance, 2013) Less proficiency in librarians and specialists (Sullo & Gomes, 2016) Familiarity with the clinical environment of librarians (Cruse & Protzko, 2014) Lack of medical terminology awareness Murphy & Boden, 2015;Perrier et al, 2014) 02. Cultural Personal Librarians have low self esteem (Murphy & Boden, 2015) Negative attitude of medical staff towards hospital librarians (Reid, 2011;Murphy & Boden, 2015;Perrier et al, 2014) Negative attitude of hospital management towards clinical librarians (Beschnett & Bulger, 2013;Butson & Pauly, 2013;Cooper & Crum, 2013) (Cruse & Protzko, 2014) Poor interpersonal relationships (between clinical librarians and medical teams) (Murphy & Boden, 2015) 03.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%