2022
DOI: 10.19069/kordialect.2022.35.107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Study on the Use of Honorific Ending ‘-Si-’ for the Situation Subject by Netizen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Jung, 2000;Sohn, 1999). However, since the 1990s, Japanese (Cook, 1997(Cook, , 1998Maynard, 1993;Okamoto, 1998Okamoto, , 1999 and Korean (Kim and Strauss, 2018;Lee, 1996Lee, , 1999Lee and Cho, 2015;Strauss and Eun, 2005;Yoon, 2015) studies that utilize conversation data have demonstrated that speakers often shift between different honorific levels within one spate of conversation. These studies often draw on the theoretical framework of indexicality (Ochs, 1992;Peirce and Buchler, 1955;Silverstein, 2003), analyzing such shifts as indexing momentary shifts in a speaker's stance in their construction and negotiation of the self, relationship with the addressee, the current speech event, the action under way, and so forth.…”
Section: =>mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jung, 2000;Sohn, 1999). However, since the 1990s, Japanese (Cook, 1997(Cook, , 1998Maynard, 1993;Okamoto, 1998Okamoto, , 1999 and Korean (Kim and Strauss, 2018;Lee, 1996Lee, , 1999Lee and Cho, 2015;Strauss and Eun, 2005;Yoon, 2015) studies that utilize conversation data have demonstrated that speakers often shift between different honorific levels within one spate of conversation. These studies often draw on the theoretical framework of indexicality (Ochs, 1992;Peirce and Buchler, 1955;Silverstein, 2003), analyzing such shifts as indexing momentary shifts in a speaker's stance in their construction and negotiation of the self, relationship with the addressee, the current speech event, the action under way, and so forth.…”
Section: =>mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strauss and Eun (2005) suggest that they differ in terms of the semantic feature +/−boundary and its attendant indexing of exclusion and inclusion within the phenomenon known as honorific speech level alternation, whereas Eun and Strauss (2004) claim that hapsyo-chey delivers new non-shared information and hayyo-chey shares common-sense-level information. C.-S. Lee (1996), in 2. This style is considered inappropriate in normal interpersonal relationships and is used only in prayers, poetry, and rituals, although it was not infrequent as recently as in the mid-twentieth century.…”
Section: Descriptive Explanations Of Hapshy-chey and Hayyo-cheymentioning
confidence: 99%