2011
DOI: 10.4103/0973-1482.82917
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study on the tumor volume computation between different 3D treatment planning systems in radiotherapy

Abstract: The study shows that all the treatment planning systems showed variation in computing the tumor volume and the CTV to PTV generation also varied with the planning systems.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tumor height and brain height were measured on the post‐contrast CT image slice on which the tumor was the largest using the measuring tool . The various volumes used in the study for tumor and brain were measured using the volume measuring tool in the planning systems . The gross tumor volume:brain volume and planning target volume:brain volume were then calculated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tumor height and brain height were measured on the post‐contrast CT image slice on which the tumor was the largest using the measuring tool . The various volumes used in the study for tumor and brain were measured using the volume measuring tool in the planning systems . The gross tumor volume:brain volume and planning target volume:brain volume were then calculated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors considered deviances of ± 2% of PCI as “nearly equal”; effects of similar order could occur due to dose grid effects and effects of digitization (voxel generation) of a spherical object (see [15] for volume effects of structure definition). Thus, only for a PTV diameter of 1.0 cm and a SID of 100 cm, the PCI differed markedly for MLC compared with circular collimator (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper they have separately contoured on each planning systems. Prabhakar et al 15 assessed on the variation of Tumor volume between different treatment planning systems. The tumor volume for normal IMRT and IGRT in head and neck is generally greater than 300 cc but the OARs in this region ranges between 0.1 cc (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%