Abstract:The thermal stability of the C 60 photopolymer, the C 60 ozopolymer, and photochlorinated C 60 was studied by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) and TGAdifferential thermal analysis techniques up to 950 • C in comparison to graphite and pure C 60 . The ozopolymer was found to be the least stable material followed by C 60 Cl x . The resulting residual carbonaceous matter formed by the decomposition of the photopolymer and the ozopolymer has been studied by Fourier transform-infrared (… Show more
“…[6] Of course X-ray pattern of C 60 -PFO does not correspond anymore to the pattern of the pristine C 60 [23] which in fact it is characterized by the most intense reflection at 2y ¼ 10.834 followed by other two intense peaks at 2y ¼ 17.698 and 20.776 . Other low intensity reflections of C 60 appear at 2y ¼ 21.711 , 27.432 , 28.190 , 30.882 , 32.823.…”
Section: Marcel Dekker Inc • 270 Madison Avenue • New York Ny 10016mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Both curves reach a incipient plateau at about 600-650 C. However, at that temperature, the weight loss of C 60 -PFO is roughly À60% vs. À40% of C 70 -PFO underlining the reduced content of adsorbed moisture in the case of C 70 -PFO and also a reduced degree of oxygenated groups in comparison to the other PFO. As discussed in a previous work, [6] the differential thermal analysis (DTA) of PFO is characterized by a strong endothermal peak at about 113 C due to the evaporation of the bound water and by a broad exothermal decomposition with a peak located at 300-350 C but with onset temperature for the decomposition at much lower temperature (around 200-220 C). Figure 1 also shows the thermal behavior of graphite oxide prepared in the present work and studied with the same thermobalance and under the same conditions as for the PFO samples.…”
Section: Marcel Dekker Inc • 270 Madison Avenue • New York Ny 10016mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In fact, upon exposure to air for months its original weight was doubled. [5] The TGA of PFO under an inert atmosphere [6,7] is characterized by a 10% weight loss at about 100 C due to elimination of trapped solvent and absorbed water. Exactly the same weight loss is reported in Ref.…”
Section: Hydrophilic Behavior and Thermal Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4,5] The polymeric nature and the chemical structure of the resulting product has already been studied. [4][5][6][7][8][9] We have named the polymeric materials obtained by prolonged ozonation of C 60 and C 70 ''fullerene ozopolymers'' [4][5][6][7][8][9] and also ''polymeric fullerene oxides'' PFO and they will be referred in this way in the subsequent part of this paper.…”
A brief survey of the chemical structural analogies and differences between graphite oxide and fullerene ozopolymers or polymeric fullerene oxides (PFO) is presented. Graphite oxide is the product of oxidation of graphite prepared with strong oxidizing agents while PFO is the products formed by prolonged ozonation of C 60 or C 70 in solution. Notwithstanding the different starting substrates and oxidation conditions, elemental analyses, FT-IR spectroscopy and 13 C-NMR spectroscopy suggest a very similar chemical structure for graphite oxide and PFO. A further analogy is the possibility to perform reduction or oxidation reactions on both substrates considered. Graphite oxide and PFO have also in common the ability to act as ion exchangers and as metal ion binders. Even the thermal behavior is comparable. However, X-ray powder diffraction has confirmed that graphite oxide still has a layered structure derived from graphite but with the graphene sheets at much bigger distance from each other due to the intercalation of oxidized groups and solvent molecules, while PFO do not show at all any sign of layered structure either from the X-ray spectra and also by its behavior in solution which is strikingly different from that shown by graphite oxide.
“…[6] Of course X-ray pattern of C 60 -PFO does not correspond anymore to the pattern of the pristine C 60 [23] which in fact it is characterized by the most intense reflection at 2y ¼ 10.834 followed by other two intense peaks at 2y ¼ 17.698 and 20.776 . Other low intensity reflections of C 60 appear at 2y ¼ 21.711 , 27.432 , 28.190 , 30.882 , 32.823.…”
Section: Marcel Dekker Inc • 270 Madison Avenue • New York Ny 10016mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Both curves reach a incipient plateau at about 600-650 C. However, at that temperature, the weight loss of C 60 -PFO is roughly À60% vs. À40% of C 70 -PFO underlining the reduced content of adsorbed moisture in the case of C 70 -PFO and also a reduced degree of oxygenated groups in comparison to the other PFO. As discussed in a previous work, [6] the differential thermal analysis (DTA) of PFO is characterized by a strong endothermal peak at about 113 C due to the evaporation of the bound water and by a broad exothermal decomposition with a peak located at 300-350 C but with onset temperature for the decomposition at much lower temperature (around 200-220 C). Figure 1 also shows the thermal behavior of graphite oxide prepared in the present work and studied with the same thermobalance and under the same conditions as for the PFO samples.…”
Section: Marcel Dekker Inc • 270 Madison Avenue • New York Ny 10016mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In fact, upon exposure to air for months its original weight was doubled. [5] The TGA of PFO under an inert atmosphere [6,7] is characterized by a 10% weight loss at about 100 C due to elimination of trapped solvent and absorbed water. Exactly the same weight loss is reported in Ref.…”
Section: Hydrophilic Behavior and Thermal Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4,5] The polymeric nature and the chemical structure of the resulting product has already been studied. [4][5][6][7][8][9] We have named the polymeric materials obtained by prolonged ozonation of C 60 and C 70 ''fullerene ozopolymers'' [4][5][6][7][8][9] and also ''polymeric fullerene oxides'' PFO and they will be referred in this way in the subsequent part of this paper.…”
A brief survey of the chemical structural analogies and differences between graphite oxide and fullerene ozopolymers or polymeric fullerene oxides (PFO) is presented. Graphite oxide is the product of oxidation of graphite prepared with strong oxidizing agents while PFO is the products formed by prolonged ozonation of C 60 or C 70 in solution. Notwithstanding the different starting substrates and oxidation conditions, elemental analyses, FT-IR spectroscopy and 13 C-NMR spectroscopy suggest a very similar chemical structure for graphite oxide and PFO. A further analogy is the possibility to perform reduction or oxidation reactions on both substrates considered. Graphite oxide and PFO have also in common the ability to act as ion exchangers and as metal ion binders. Even the thermal behavior is comparable. However, X-ray powder diffraction has confirmed that graphite oxide still has a layered structure derived from graphite but with the graphene sheets at much bigger distance from each other due to the intercalation of oxidized groups and solvent molecules, while PFO do not show at all any sign of layered structure either from the X-ray spectra and also by its behavior in solution which is strikingly different from that shown by graphite oxide.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.