Geometric parameters of the diphenylamine molecule were determined by gas-phase electron diffraction and quantum-chemical calculations. By gas-phase electron diffraction, the molecule has an asymmetric structure with torsion angles about N3C bonds of 345.6(23)o and 173.4(46)o, which agrees with RHF/6-31G** calculations. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations at the B3LYP/6-31G** level of theory lead to a C 2 molecular conformation in the ground electronic state. The principal experimental geometric parameters are as follows: bond lengths: C3N 1.417(1), C3C av 1.403(1) A; and bond angles: CNC 123.9(5)o, and NCC 121.5o (assumed) and 116.4o.Proceeding with a systematic research into the structure of phenylphosphines [133], here we present the results of a structural study of diphenyamine (HNPH 2 ). It is important to compare the conformations and structural parameters of mono-, di-and triphenylamines and -phosphines. The analysis of phenylphosphines is presented in [3]. The structure of gaseous diphenylamine has not been studied.Quantum-chemical calculations. Geometry optimization of the diphenylamine molecule was performed by both semiempirical [439] and ab initio methods [8, 10315]. In geometry optimization, the most important parameters that determine the conformation of this molecule are piramidality of the N atom (measured by the sum of its bond angles) and torsion angles of phenyl groups relative to the C3N3C plane (Fig. 1). In view of the possibility of free rotation of phenyl groups and also the low barrier to inversion of the N atom, a number of possible conformation have been suggested for diphenylamine in the literature. Geometry optimization by semiempirical methods in different approximations (CNDO/2, INDO, MINDO/3, and MNDO) leads to a molecular conformation in which the N atom possesses a pyramidal coordination and phenyl groups have different torsion angles relative to the CNC plane. Therewith, the C 3 C 2 NC 8 and C 9 C 8 NC 2 torsion angles and differences between them depend remarkably on the method used [5]. By contrast, the AM1-optimized conformation [8] is propeller-like and has C 2 symmetry with equal torsion angles (27.7o) and a planar coordination of bonds around the N atom. Moreover, Bredas et al. [8] have been the first who performed ab initio calculations of the diphenylamine molecule with the 3-21G basis set. The results of the latter calculation gave indirect evidence to show that the AM1 method is suitable for geometry optimization of diphenylamine and its analogs. Boyle [9] have optimized the geometry of diphenylamine molecule and some of its ortho-substituted analogs by the AM1 method and found that the global minimum corresponds to an asymmetric conformation with a pyramidal N atom and that the torsion angles of the phenyl rings relative to the CNC plane depend on the configuration of bonds around the N atom (planar or pyramidal). As follows from the results of ab initio calculations with the STO-3G and 6-31G basis sets [10], the most stable conformation possesses equal 10 11...