2009 21st IEEE International Conference on Tools With Artificial Intelligence 2009
DOI: 10.1109/ictai.2009.25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Study on the Relationships of Classifier Performance Metrics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
74
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
74
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For a binary classification problem, these performance measurements are based on the values of the confusion matrix: Number of True Positives (TP), number of True Negatives (TN), number of False Positives (FP) and number of False Negatives (FN) (Seliya et al, 2009). In this work, we used six performance metricsprecision, recall, specificity, efficiency, F-measure and G-measure -as follows.…”
Section: Metrics For Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a binary classification problem, these performance measurements are based on the values of the confusion matrix: Number of True Positives (TP), number of True Negatives (TN), number of False Positives (FP) and number of False Negatives (FN) (Seliya et al, 2009). In this work, we used six performance metricsprecision, recall, specificity, efficiency, F-measure and G-measure -as follows.…”
Section: Metrics For Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collect the Pi values into P Mutual Information [2], Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistic [24], Deviance [26], Geometric Mean [26], Area Under the ROC Curve [7], Area Under the Precision Recall Curve [24], and Signal-to-Noise [28]. Each of these techniques are filter-based feature ranking techniques.…”
Section: E Robust Rank Aggregationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will use the FNR and FPR as two of the performance measures in this study [22]. We have omitted the TNR and TPR since they can easily be computed from the FNR and FPR.…”
Section: Performance Measurementioning
confidence: 99%