2022
DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2022.2046160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Study on the Power Parameter in Power Prior Bayesian Analysis

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other approaches attempt to determine an appropriate value of by optimization. Different information criteria, from the standard deviance information criterion to more complex penalized likelihood-type criterion, have been used [ 113 ] including the marginal likelihood [ 114 ] and the pseudo-marginal likelihood [ 115 ] which are evaluated using only the target data.…”
Section: Model Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other approaches attempt to determine an appropriate value of by optimization. Different information criteria, from the standard deviance information criterion to more complex penalized likelihood-type criterion, have been used [ 113 ] including the marginal likelihood [ 114 ] and the pseudo-marginal likelihood [ 115 ] which are evaluated using only the target data.…”
Section: Model Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In principle, the use of the normalized power prior does not necessarily assume a proper initial prior on bold-italicθ$\bm \theta$, whereas an improper initial prior often results in a similar normalized power prior after incorporating information from D 0 . Moreover, if π0(bold-italicθ)$\pi _0({\bm \theta })$ is improper, the power prior may not be proper for all δ>0$\delta > 0$, even for the commonly used reference priors (Han et al., 2022). As a result, the starting point δ 1 may not be close to 0 and can vary case by case.…”
Section: Background and Problem Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reference 1 show that Remark 3 in the appendix of this paper is incorrect; the result needs further regularity conditions in order to hold. Please see Theorem 2 in Reference 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Reference 1 show that Remark 3 in the appendix of this paper is incorrect; the result needs further regularity conditions in order to hold. Please see Theorem 2 in Reference 1. The authors would like to note that this in no way impacts any of the other results, theoretical or empirical, presented herein.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%