2008
DOI: 10.5668/jehs.2008.34.2.131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Study on the Particles Density Estimation in Seoul Metropolitan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The particle size distribution of the resuspended PM sample was compared to that of the original PM sample. We modified the particle size distribution data provided by NIST using atmospheric particle density data and used it as the distribution of the original PM sample ( Kim, Kim & Hwang, 2008 ). The total number of resuspended particles was collected by the detector and averaged by surface type.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The particle size distribution of the resuspended PM sample was compared to that of the original PM sample. We modified the particle size distribution data provided by NIST using atmospheric particle density data and used it as the distribution of the original PM sample ( Kim, Kim & Hwang, 2008 ). The total number of resuspended particles was collected by the detector and averaged by surface type.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1.85±0.14 (calculated) Dry desert aerosol ⁄2.5 μm 1.56±0.12 (retrieved) Kim et al (2008) 1.92 (winter) Urban aerosol ⁄10 μm 1.64 (spring) 1.57 (fall) Heo et al (1986) 2.2~Metals from soil dust 1.3~2.2 Metals from combustion Pitz et al (2003) 1.6 (1.0~2.5) Urban aerosol 10 nm~2.03 μm Karg (2000) 1 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%