2016
DOI: 10.1504/ijdmb.2016.074685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study on the most common algorithms implemented for cancer gene search and classifications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other algorithms have been used for the purpose of genetic classification in the field of cancer research, featuring both machine learning algorithms and feature selection [39]. Some of these have been very successful in identifying signs of colon cancer [22,40,41]; the taxonomic approaches used include Genetic Algorithm (GA), Particle Swarm Optimisation (PSO), Information Gain (IG), minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (mRMR) (for feature selection), Support Vector Machines (SVM), Naïve Bayes (NB), Decision Trees (DT) and Genetic Programming (GP) [39,40,[42][43][44][45].…”
Section: Background and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other algorithms have been used for the purpose of genetic classification in the field of cancer research, featuring both machine learning algorithms and feature selection [39]. Some of these have been very successful in identifying signs of colon cancer [22,40,41]; the taxonomic approaches used include Genetic Algorithm (GA), Particle Swarm Optimisation (PSO), Information Gain (IG), minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (mRMR) (for feature selection), Support Vector Machines (SVM), Naïve Bayes (NB), Decision Trees (DT) and Genetic Programming (GP) [39,40,[42][43][44][45].…”
Section: Background and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This combination is different from previous two stage approached, and we tested the accuracy using four classifiers: SVM, NB, DT and KNN to ensure the investigation is conducted rigorously. The reasons to employ these algorithms are: 1) They had shown better performance than other selection algorithms in the field, and had reflected very good effectiveness in many colorectal cancer research studies [39][40][41]; 2) GA has the ability to manage high dimensionality datasets for the colon cancer [65][66][67]; 3) GA can achieve interesting results when combined with other algorithms [68]; 4) GA is easily integrated and worked in parallel with other algorithms; 5) IG had advantages in eliminating redundant genes and reducing noise [26,69,70]. ; 6) Combining the GA and IG in stage 1 of this framework model will achieve the target of generating a subset of features which are top ranked and with very good quality; 7) utilizing the mRMR in as a multifilter in stage 2 will refine the subset generated from stage 1 through another subset selection of features.…”
Section: The Objectives Of Investigationmentioning
confidence: 99%