2005
DOI: 10.4017/gt.2005.03.04.076.00
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study on the emergence of problematic behaviours of the walkable elderly with dementia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Disabling dementia was defined as an incident functional disability with dementia according to the LTCI system whereby dementia exceeded rank I (rank ≥II) on the dementia scale of the Doctor's Opinion Paper, as individuals who have mild or moderate dementia are classified as rank II …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Disabling dementia was defined as an incident functional disability with dementia according to the LTCI system whereby dementia exceeded rank I (rank ≥II) on the dementia scale of the Doctor's Opinion Paper, as individuals who have mild or moderate dementia are classified as rank II …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disabling dementia was defined as an incident functional disability with dementia according to the LTCI system whereby dementia exceeded rank I (rank ≥II) on the dementia scale of the Doctor's Opinion Paper, as individuals who have mild or moderate dementia are classified as rank II. 16,18,19 We obtained a data set that included information on LTCI certification, death, or emigration from Ohsaki City based on an agreement.…”
Section: Follow-up (Incident Dementia)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Dementia Scale is classified into eight ranks (0, I, IIa, IIb, IIIa, IIIb, IV or M. Rank M means that an individual has severe dementia‐related behavioral disturbance that requires medical intervention). A rank exceeding I is usually used as an outcome measure of incident dementia, because individuals who have mild or moderate dementia are classified as rank II . This definition is the same as the Japanese government's estimation of dementia prevalence .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A rank exceeding I is usually used as an outcome measure of incident dementia, because individuals who have mild or moderate dementia are classified as rank II. 16,[21][22][23] This definition is the same as the Japanese government's estimation of dementia prevalence. 4 A previous study has shown that the Dementia Scale is well correlated with the Mini-Mental State Examination score (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient -0.736).…”
Section: Follow Up (Incident Dementia)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Dementia Scale is classified into six ranks (0, I-IV, M; Rank M means that an individual has severe dementiarelated behavioral disturbance that requires medical intervention), and a rank exceeding I is usually used as an outcome measure of incident dementia because individuals who have mild or moderate dementia are classified as rank II. 24,[29][30][31] A previous study has shown that the Dementia Scale is negatively correlated with the Mini Mental State Examination score (Spearman rank correlation coefficient = À0.736). 32 We obtained a dataset that included information on LTCI certification, death, or emigration from Ohsaki City.…”
Section: Covariatesmentioning
confidence: 99%