2009
DOI: 10.20460/jgsm.2009318462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Study on the Causes of Strategies Failing to Success

Abstract: ABSTRACT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is consistent with our expectations and suggests that organizations should, and can, firmly base their implementation activities on their strong financial infrastructure to design better budgets, metrics, and reward structures, which are all reported as key success factors of successful implementation (Allio, 2005). For example, Koseoglu, Barca, and Karayormuk (2009), in their study of 483 Turkish managers, identified compensation practices as an important factor that influences the success of strategy implementation. Therefore, our finding that well performing firms implement their decisions better than poorly performing ones suggest that organizations should support their implementation activities by better budgets, metrics, and reward (compensation) structures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This finding is consistent with our expectations and suggests that organizations should, and can, firmly base their implementation activities on their strong financial infrastructure to design better budgets, metrics, and reward structures, which are all reported as key success factors of successful implementation (Allio, 2005). For example, Koseoglu, Barca, and Karayormuk (2009), in their study of 483 Turkish managers, identified compensation practices as an important factor that influences the success of strategy implementation. Therefore, our finding that well performing firms implement their decisions better than poorly performing ones suggest that organizations should support their implementation activities by better budgets, metrics, and reward (compensation) structures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Tiemersma (2015) and Wolczek (2014) emphasize that top managers do not sufficiently collaborate with mid-level managers, although the latter play a key role in the strategy implementation process by translating top management's expectations into the daily workload of their subordinates. Top managers usually do not coordinate and integrate activities between different levels and business functions in a proper manner (Al Ghamdi, 1998;Hrebiniak, 2006;Pučko & Čater, 2008;Koseoglu et al, 2009, Kalali et al, 2011 and the responsibilities during the implementation process are not clearly defined (Hrebiniak, 2005;Shah, 2005;Radoš, 2011;Behery et al, 2016). In addition to this, top managers fail to collect employees' suggestions and develop appropriate programs to improve employees' skills and competencies needed for the implementation of new strategies or quick adaption to changing conditions (Shah, 2005;Pučko & Čater, 2008;Heathfield, 2019), which is why employees performing operational tasks are not ready to accept and execute what is expected of them.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If strategic planning is strategically implemented, it can be arguably and reasonably predicted that organizations would undoubtedly achieve their goal and objectives. The failure of most of the strategic plans stems from the poor quality of the plan and poor implementation (Resnick, 2010; Khadem, 2008;Koseoglu et al, 2009). An ideal strategic planning and implementation should be able to survive moderate challenges and at the end of them all, deliver on its goal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%