2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-51831-8_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Study on Team Bisimulations for BPP Nets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have extended Vogler's proof technique in [15], based on ordered markings, that he used to prove decidability of (strong) fully-concurrent bisimilarity for safe nets, to bounded nets by means of indexed ordered markings. The extension is flexible enough to be applicable also to other similar equivalences, such as causal-net bisimilarity [7,9]. While decidability of fully-concurrent bisimilarity for bounded nets was already proved by Montanari and Pistore [12], our result for causal-net bisimilarity is new.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We have extended Vogler's proof technique in [15], based on ordered markings, that he used to prove decidability of (strong) fully-concurrent bisimilarity for safe nets, to bounded nets by means of indexed ordered markings. The extension is flexible enough to be applicable also to other similar equivalences, such as causal-net bisimilarity [7,9]. While decidability of fully-concurrent bisimilarity for bounded nets was already proved by Montanari and Pistore [12], our result for causal-net bisimilarity is new.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Truly concurrent equivalences, such as fully-concurrent bisimilarity [2] or causal-net bisimilarity [7,9], have been advocated as very suitable equivalences to compare the behavior of Petri nets. However, most results about their decidability [15,11,16] are limited to the class of finite safe nets, i.e., nets whose places can hold one token at most.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the subclass of BPP nets (i.e., nets whose transitions have singleton pre-set), place bisimilarity coincides with team bisimilarity [10], which is actually coinductive and, for this reason, very efficiently decidable (precisely in O(m • n • log(n + 1)) time, where n is the number of places and m of transitions), characterized by a simple modal logic, and even axiomatizable over the process algebra BPP with guarded summation and guarded recursion [9]. Moreover, d-place bisimilarity specializes to h-team bisimilarity [11], which coincides with fully-concurrent bisimilarity on this subclass of P/T nets.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Essentially, a d-place bisimulation is a relation on the set whose elements are the places and the empty marking, which is considered as an additional dummy place. This weaker variant is still finer than fully-concurrent bisimilarity [3], even if on BPP nets, i.e., nets whose transitions have pre-set of size one, d-place bisimilarity specializes to h-team bisimilarity [11], which coincides with fullyconcurrent bisimilarity [3] on this class of nets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%