2018
DOI: 10.4103/aip.aip_39_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study on suicidal ideation and associated factors in prisoners of addis ababa correctional center

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning the prevalence of suicidal ideation, the magnitude of suicidal ideation in the current study was in line with the other studies reported that were carried out among prisoners in Ethiopia 21.9% [26], United States of America (23.5%) [6] and Pakistan (22%) [33]. Contrarily, the prevalence of suicidal ideation in this study was higher than in the two studies that were previously conducted in Ethiopia: 8.04% in Addis Abba Correction Centre [34] and 16.6% in Jimma Correctional Institution [35] and other studies done in Cambodia (7%) [36], Chicago (10%) [21], USA (9.4%, 15.1%) [37,38], New South Wales, Australia (16%) [39], Taiwan (12.5%) [40] and Colombia (14.9%) [41]. The possible reason for the observed difference might be assessment tool differences.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Concerning the prevalence of suicidal ideation, the magnitude of suicidal ideation in the current study was in line with the other studies reported that were carried out among prisoners in Ethiopia 21.9% [26], United States of America (23.5%) [6] and Pakistan (22%) [33]. Contrarily, the prevalence of suicidal ideation in this study was higher than in the two studies that were previously conducted in Ethiopia: 8.04% in Addis Abba Correction Centre [34] and 16.6% in Jimma Correctional Institution [35] and other studies done in Cambodia (7%) [36], Chicago (10%) [21], USA (9.4%, 15.1%) [37,38], New South Wales, Australia (16%) [39], Taiwan (12.5%) [40] and Colombia (14.9%) [41]. The possible reason for the observed difference might be assessment tool differences.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%