2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2011.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study on scale factor in distributed differential evolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the panmictic population structure, the original DE algorithms (Storn and Price 1995) are belong to this category, where any individuals can interact with any other one in the whole population. By introducing some structures into population, two main canonical kinds of structured population in DE could be found in literature, i.e., cellular DE (cDE) (Noman and Iba 2011;Noroozi et al 2011;Dorronsoro and Bouvry 2010;Liao et al 2015b) and distributed DE (dDE) (Weber et al 2011(Weber et al , 2010. DE with cellular topology (Noman and Iba 2011;Noroozi et al 2011;Dorronsoro and Bouvry 2010;Liao et al 2015b) Uses the cellular topology to define the configuration of neighborhood and select parents for mutation from the neighbors DE with ring topology-based mutation operators (Liao et al 2015a) Employs the ring topology to define the neighborhood and groups the neighbors to construct direction vector for mutation dDE with scale factor inheritance mechanism (Weber et al 2011) Incorporates the distributed population structure in DE and proposes the employment of multiple scale factor values within dDE structures…”
Section: Improving Mutation Operators With Neighborhood Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the panmictic population structure, the original DE algorithms (Storn and Price 1995) are belong to this category, where any individuals can interact with any other one in the whole population. By introducing some structures into population, two main canonical kinds of structured population in DE could be found in literature, i.e., cellular DE (cDE) (Noman and Iba 2011;Noroozi et al 2011;Dorronsoro and Bouvry 2010;Liao et al 2015b) and distributed DE (dDE) (Weber et al 2011(Weber et al , 2010. DE with cellular topology (Noman and Iba 2011;Noroozi et al 2011;Dorronsoro and Bouvry 2010;Liao et al 2015b) Uses the cellular topology to define the configuration of neighborhood and select parents for mutation from the neighbors DE with ring topology-based mutation operators (Liao et al 2015a) Employs the ring topology to define the neighborhood and groups the neighbors to construct direction vector for mutation dDE with scale factor inheritance mechanism (Weber et al 2011) Incorporates the distributed population structure in DE and proposes the employment of multiple scale factor values within dDE structures…”
Section: Improving Mutation Operators With Neighborhood Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these DE variants, the individuals for mutation are selected according to a neighbor list constructed from the population topologies. Two main canonical kinds of structured population in DE is employed in literature, i.e., cellular DE (cDE) (Noman and Iba 2011;Noroozi et al 2011;Dorronsoro and Bouvry 2010) and distributed DE (dDE) (Weber et al 2011(Weber et al , 2010Neri et al 2011). In De Falco et al (2014, the impact of several network topologies on the performance of distributed differential evolution was investigated.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3, many attempts with neighborhood or/and direction information of population are effective to guide the search of DE. Furthermore, the selection of parents in mutation has been verified to be critical for the DE performance (Noman and Iba 2011;Noroozi et al 2011;Dorronsoro and Bouvry 2010;Weber et al 2011Weber et al , 2010Neri et al 2011;Das et al 2009;Omran et al 2006Omran et al , 2009Cai et al 2012;Wang and Xiang 2008;Fan and Lampinen 2003;Cai and Wang 2013;Bi and Xiao 2011). However, in most DE algorithms, on the one hand, the base and difference vectors are always selected randomly or locally.…”
Section: Motivationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since, as shown in [2], [10], [11], and [12], DE is characterized by a limited amount of search moves, modifications of the original scheme can lead to a performance enhancement. These modifications, in some cases, are not major in terms of programming effort but can still lead to significant improvements, see [13] and [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%