2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.trip.2023.100814
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study on road accident prediction and contributing factors using explainable machine learning models: analysis and performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Men, especially those under 25, are disproportionately involved in RTAs. They are responsible for 73% of deaths and have a threefold higher risk than their female counterparts [5] . Various reasons contribute to this gender gap, including mood stability, driving habits, and alcohol and tobacco use.…”
Section: Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Men, especially those under 25, are disproportionately involved in RTAs. They are responsible for 73% of deaths and have a threefold higher risk than their female counterparts [5] . Various reasons contribute to this gender gap, including mood stability, driving habits, and alcohol and tobacco use.…”
Section: Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine Learning (ML) models to predict road accident severity using New Zealand's Road accident data from 2016-2020 (12) . The models used include Random Forest (RF), Decision Jungle (DJ), Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (L-GBM), and Categorical Boosting (CatBoost).…”
Section: Background Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key insight from the Tables 4, 5 and 6 and Figure 2 shows that the Random Forest is the most effective algorithm among the three ML algorithms for performing this particular task. (12) ML models (RF, DJ, AdaBoost, XGBoost, L-GBM, CatBoost)…”
Section: Fig 2 Accuracy Of Various ML Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, studies comparing the traditional models with ML models report contrary result. While some studies report ML algorithms of Random Forest reporting higher accuracy [ 30 ], other studies report that the traditional models report the best performance [ 31 ]. While our current study doesn't involve a comparison with traditional models, it focuses on evaluating various ML models to identify models that demonstrates superior performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%