2012
DOI: 10.1007/s12555-012-0112-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study on reliability enhancement for laser and camera calibration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here Table 1 showed the standard deviations of evaluation function for the 21-group different scene in each independent experiment; the best extrinsic parameters calibration results are in the 10th experiment, the standard deviation of fitness function is only 0.2981, and the average of the fitness function is 0.3381, which is better than the nonlinear least square and nonlinear Gauss-Newton optimization methods for different constraints in [11]. Specifically, extrinsic parameters calibration is optimized by the nonlinear least square method for the first constraint (15); then these parameters are re-optimized by the nonlinear Gauss-Newton method for the second constraint (16) in [11]. In addition, the nonlinear least square and nonlinear Gauss-Newton methods are both utilized step by step for extrinsic parameters calibration process in [11].…”
Section: Pso For the Extrinsic Parameters Separated Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here Table 1 showed the standard deviations of evaluation function for the 21-group different scene in each independent experiment; the best extrinsic parameters calibration results are in the 10th experiment, the standard deviation of fitness function is only 0.2981, and the average of the fitness function is 0.3381, which is better than the nonlinear least square and nonlinear Gauss-Newton optimization methods for different constraints in [11]. Specifically, extrinsic parameters calibration is optimized by the nonlinear least square method for the first constraint (15); then these parameters are re-optimized by the nonlinear Gauss-Newton method for the second constraint (16) in [11]. In addition, the nonlinear least square and nonlinear Gauss-Newton methods are both utilized step by step for extrinsic parameters calibration process in [11].…”
Section: Pso For the Extrinsic Parameters Separated Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The most widely used model of camera is the typical pinhole model of camera [15]. The equation of the model is…”
Section: Spatial Coordinate Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the laser rangefinder coordinates system is ( , , ) t t t f x y z , ( , ) g u v are the coordinates of the optical image plane, and the target object coordinates in the world coordinate system are ( , , ) c c c h x y z . The most widely-used model of camera is the typical pinhole camera [16]. The equation of the model is as in (1):…”
Section: Spatial Coordinate Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, the initial values of are optimized by the nonlinear least square method under the first constraint (16), and then the optimized is re-optimized by the nonlinear Gauss-Newton method under the second constraint (17). As for the optimized initial values solved by SVD, they can be optimized by the least square method with the constraint formula (16). The MatLab toolbox can provide the non-linear least square optimization function of optimset( ) and the result is = [1.07568368779805e-05, 2.51350684888328e-06, 1.163742235036e-05; -2.51987753199269e-07,8.9501764963208e-06, -0.0003675875774005; 1.61472210106329e-06, -6.79520649508e-06,-0.00119390634863761]…”
Section: The Parameters' Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%