2019
DOI: 10.1080/24699322.2018.1557888
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study on quality assessment of the surface EEG signal based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method

Abstract: Surface EEG (Electroencephalography) signal is vulnerable to interference due to its characteristics and sampling methods. So it is of great importance to evaluate the collected EEG signal prior to use. Traditional methods usually use the impedance between skin and electrode to estimate the quality of the EEG signal, which has shortcomings such as monotonous features, high false positive rates, and poor real-time capability. Aiming at addressing these issues, this paper presents a novel model of EEG quality as… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…erefore, it can improve the shortcomings of the current BIM calculation comprehensive evaluation [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…erefore, it can improve the shortcomings of the current BIM calculation comprehensive evaluation [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As sensor contact quality decreases, the signal decreases in resolution which results in reduced variance of the amplitude and fluctuations. The standard deviation of the amplitude (A_SD) of the EEG signal derived from adults and children can thus be considered to be a proxy measure for sensor sensitivity ( Liu et al, 2019 ). The average A_SD obtained across all sensors in the four devices in an assessment week decreased as the study progressed and the number of cumulative recordings done on these devices increased ( Figures 4A,B ), indicating that sensor quality may have degraded with increasing use.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the mergers and acquisitions in the last year were inspected, focusing on the performance of the target company before and after the merger. The conclusion of the study is that, compared with the average level of the industry, the performance of the target company before and after the merger did not show a significant momentum of improvement [ 9 14 ]. However, the conduct of mergers and acquisitions may cause structural adjustments within the group, which in turn will cause some companies to change their business direction after mergers and acquisitions and be classified in another industry [ 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%