2007
DOI: 10.3327/jnst.44.354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Study on Precipitation Behavior of Plutonium and Other Transuranium Elements with N-Cyclohexyl-2-pyrrolidone for Development of a Simple Reprocessing Process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, PuO 2 (NO 3 ) 2 ( L1 ) 2 (Figure a) deposited from HNO 3 (aq.) as orange microcrystalline powder in 80–85 % yield ([PuO 2 2+ ] init = 42 m m , i.e., 6–8 m m soluble in 1.3 m HNO 3 and 0.35 m L1 ; 6.7 m m soluble in 3 m HNO 3 ) as shown in Figure b. Interestingly, its crystal structure (Figure b, monoclinic P 2 1 / c, a = 7.0236(5) Å, b = 18.431(1) Å, c = 10.5097(7) Å, β = 102.255(2)°) was fully different from that of UO 2 (NO 3 ) 2 ( L1 ) 2 (triclinic P 1, a = 8.6794(10) Å, b = 8.8490(10) Å, c = 9.7523(10) Å, α = 113.86(1)°, β = 93.31(1)°, γ = 109.06(1)°) despite the compositional analogy and was somewhat similar to that of UO 2 (NO 3 ) 2 ( L4 ) 2 (monoclinic P 2 1 , a = 7.089(2) Å, b = 18.117(5) Å, c = 8.849(2) Å, β = 101.95(3)°, Figure ).…”
Section: Precipitation‐based Reprocessing For Spent Nuclear Fuelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Indeed, PuO 2 (NO 3 ) 2 ( L1 ) 2 (Figure a) deposited from HNO 3 (aq.) as orange microcrystalline powder in 80–85 % yield ([PuO 2 2+ ] init = 42 m m , i.e., 6–8 m m soluble in 1.3 m HNO 3 and 0.35 m L1 ; 6.7 m m soluble in 3 m HNO 3 ) as shown in Figure b. Interestingly, its crystal structure (Figure b, monoclinic P 2 1 / c, a = 7.0236(5) Å, b = 18.431(1) Å, c = 10.5097(7) Å, β = 102.255(2)°) was fully different from that of UO 2 (NO 3 ) 2 ( L1 ) 2 (triclinic P 1, a = 8.6794(10) Å, b = 8.8490(10) Å, c = 9.7523(10) Å, α = 113.86(1)°, β = 93.31(1)°, γ = 109.06(1)°) despite the compositional analogy and was somewhat similar to that of UO 2 (NO 3 ) 2 ( L4 ) 2 (monoclinic P 2 1 , a = 7.089(2) Å, b = 18.117(5) Å, c = 8.849(2) Å, β = 101.95(3)°, Figure ).…”
Section: Precipitation‐based Reprocessing For Spent Nuclear Fuelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conditions: (a) [Pu 4+ ] = 42 m m , [HNO 3 ] = 1.3 m , [ L1 ]/[Pu] = 5; (b) [PuO 2 2+ ] = 42 m m , [HNO 3 ] = 1.3 m , [ L1 ]/[Pu] = 10. Reproduced from ref . (Copyright 2007) with permission from Taylor & Francis.…”
Section: Precipitation‐based Reprocessing For Spent Nuclear Fuelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations