2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12070-021-02564-2
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Study on Otorhinolaryngological Presentations in Covid 19 Patients in a Tertiary Health Care Center

Abstract: Corona virus also known as 2019 novel corona virus, a single stranded positive sense RNA virus is the causative agent of COVID 19 disease. It mainly spreads via the respiratory route by means of aerosols. The objectives of our study were. To know the prevalence of ENT presentations in COVID 19 patients and to know the relationship between the symptoms and category of the disease as well as to know the relation between the blood group and recovery from the disease. The first 500 patients who were tested positiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These 40 studies (reporting on 43 cohorts) were subjected to a meta-analysis (Table ). Fifteen studies reported anosmia prevalence in 18 cohorts with a total of 7247 COVID-19 patients from regions where the D614 virus was dominant: three studies from Kuwait or Singapore and 12 from India or Pakistan. We compared such data with the results obtained in 25 studies reporting on 25 cohorts with a total of 9626 South Asian patients from the Indian subcontinent (India and Bangladesh) and Oman, when the G614 virus had become dominant (Table , illustrated in Figure A and B). , The differences in results between the two types of cohorts are shown in the forest plots (Figure A). The pooled prevalence of olfactory dysfunction in the same ethnicity (South Asians) in regions with D614 predominance was 5.33% (95% confidence interval, CI = 3.52–8.00%), while in regions with G614 predominance, it was 31.79% (95% CI = 23.26–41.76%) (Figure A, C).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These 40 studies (reporting on 43 cohorts) were subjected to a meta-analysis (Table ). Fifteen studies reported anosmia prevalence in 18 cohorts with a total of 7247 COVID-19 patients from regions where the D614 virus was dominant: three studies from Kuwait or Singapore and 12 from India or Pakistan. We compared such data with the results obtained in 25 studies reporting on 25 cohorts with a total of 9626 South Asian patients from the Indian subcontinent (India and Bangladesh) and Oman, when the G614 virus had become dominant (Table , illustrated in Figure A and B). , The differences in results between the two types of cohorts are shown in the forest plots (Figure A). The pooled prevalence of olfactory dysfunction in the same ethnicity (South Asians) in regions with D614 predominance was 5.33% (95% confidence interval, CI = 3.52–8.00%), while in regions with G614 predominance, it was 31.79% (95% CI = 23.26–41.76%) (Figure A, C).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fifteen studies reported anosmia prevalence in eighteen cohorts with a total of 7,247 COVID-19 patients from regions where the D614 virus was dominant: three studies from Kuwait and Singapore [42][43][44] and twelve from India or Pakistan. [45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56] We compared such data with the results obtained in 25 studies reporting on 25 cohorts with a total of 9,626 South Asian patients from the Indian subcontinent (India and Bangladesh) and Oman, when the G614 virus had become dominant (Table 1, illustrated in Fig. 3A, B).…”
Section: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Of South Asian Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study reflected a similar pattern, as patients across all age groups were affected, with a higher incidence observed among individuals aged 20 to 40 years. 14 Similarly, in the present study, the sample consisted of 68% (937) male and 32% (438) female patients. The age distribution included 6.6% (91) below 25 years, 6% (183) between 26 and 35 years, 19.7% (272) between 36 and 45 years, 31.7% (436) between 46 and 55 years, 10.5% (145) between 56 and 65 years, 14% (192) between 66 and 75 years, and 4% (56) above 75 years old.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%