2012
DOI: 10.3233/jae-2012-1545
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study on oscillatory and effective torques of an line-start PM motor in start-up operation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The key reasons are: the higher efficiency and power factor of LSPMSM in relation to the classical asynchronous motors together with no need to use the power electronics drives that are necessary to operate the classical permanent magnet synchronous motors [4,5]. To achieve the line start feature, the rotors of the LSPMSM contain the squirrel cage winding [6][7][8]. The authors of this paper have analyzed the asynchronous torque of LSPMSM for squirrel cage geometry adjusted to improve the asynchronous as well as synchronous operation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key reasons are: the higher efficiency and power factor of LSPMSM in relation to the classical asynchronous motors together with no need to use the power electronics drives that are necessary to operate the classical permanent magnet synchronous motors [4,5]. To achieve the line start feature, the rotors of the LSPMSM contain the squirrel cage winding [6][7][8]. The authors of this paper have analyzed the asynchronous torque of LSPMSM for squirrel cage geometry adjusted to improve the asynchronous as well as synchronous operation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The negative frequencies are merely byproducts in the Fourier transfer process. Compared with the traditional FFT approach [29,30], the proposed method is more effective in that each GFRF need not be separately estimated from the measured signals. Any order GFRF can be directly computed using the NARX model fitted to the measured signals.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%