2005
DOI: 10.1007/bf02705787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study on nickel hydroxide crystallization characteristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the pH is increased, more negatively charged surface became available which facilitated greater Ni(II) uptake on the surface of CLS and CLSC. The decrease in adsorption efficiency at higher pH (> 8.0) was due to the formation of soluble hydroxylated complexes of Ni(II) ions and their competition with the active sites and as a result the retention would decrease again [23]. The results obtained from the present study are in accordance with the earlier study related to the effect of solution pH on metal adsorption process by low-cost adsorbent [22,24,25].…”
Section: Effect Of Phsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When the pH is increased, more negatively charged surface became available which facilitated greater Ni(II) uptake on the surface of CLS and CLSC. The decrease in adsorption efficiency at higher pH (> 8.0) was due to the formation of soluble hydroxylated complexes of Ni(II) ions and their competition with the active sites and as a result the retention would decrease again [23]. The results obtained from the present study are in accordance with the earlier study related to the effect of solution pH on metal adsorption process by low-cost adsorbent [22,24,25].…”
Section: Effect Of Phsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The pH value affects the surface charge of the adsorbent, the degree of ionization, and speciation of the adsorbate during the adsorption process [22]. The decrease in adsorption efficiency at higher pH (> 8.0) was due to the formation of soluble hydroxylated complexes of Ni(II) ions and their competition with the active sites and as a result the retention would decrease again [23]. From Figure 4b, it could be observed that the adsorption increases with increase in pH and attains maximum removal of 37% at pH of 4.0-6.0 for CLS and 99% over the pH range at 4.0-8.0 for CLSC, respectively.…”
Section: Effect Of Phmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2015) 12:3993-4004 3997 increased, more negatively charged surface became available which facilitated greater Ni(II) uptake on the surface of CLP and CLPC. The decrease in adsorption efficiency at higher pH ([8.0) was due to the formation of soluble hydroxylated complexes of nickel ions and their competition with the active sites; as a result, the retention would decrease again (Lee and Lee 2005). The results obtained from the present study are in accordance with the earlier study related to the effect of solution pH on metal adsorption process by low-cost adsorbent (Ugurlu et al 2009;Prasad and Abdullah 2009;Shroff and Vaidya 2011).…”
Section: Effects Of the Contact Time On Sorptionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Figure 2 shows the kinetic profiles of Ni(II) biosorption by APSH at different pH values ranging from 3.0 to 7.0. Higher pH values were not assayed because Ni(II) ions start to precipitate at a pH value of about 8.0 (Lee and Lee 2005); thus, under these pH It was found that at the different pH values tested, the Ni(II) biosorption capacity of APSH increased as the experimental time increased, until it reached a maximum constant value, which corresponded to the biosorption equilibrium. Furthermore, Ni(II) biosorption onto APSH was strongly affected by solution pH values.…”
Section: Effect Of Solution Ph On Ni(ii) Biosorption Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 93%