2019 International Conference on Communication and Electronics Systems (ICCES) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icces45898.2019.9002284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Study on Label TSH, T3, T4U, TT4, FTI in Hyperthyroidism and Hypothyroidism using Machine Learning Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors of Shahid et al (2019) compare Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, and K-Nearest Neighbours on the UCI thyroid dataset, to discover the best performing algorithm, resulted to be Random Forest, in detecting hypo- and hyperthyroidism.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The authors of Shahid et al (2019) compare Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, and K-Nearest Neighbours on the UCI thyroid dataset, to discover the best performing algorithm, resulted to be Random Forest, in detecting hypo- and hyperthyroidism.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Looking at the public datasets, we observed that the most used dataset is the UCI one ( https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/Thyroid+Disease ), exploited 27 times ( Duggal & Shukla, 2020 ; Shahid et al, 2019 ; Pan et al, 2016 ; Pavya & Srinivasan, 2017 ; Mahurkar & Gaikwad, 2017 ; Ahmed & Soomrani, 2016 ; Tyagi, Mehra & Saxena, 2018 ; Kumar, 2020 ; Pasha & Mohamed, 2020 ; Shen et al, 2016 ; Bentaiba-Lagrid et al, 2020 ; Raisinghani et al, 2019 ; Vivar et al, 2020 ; Li et al, 2019b ; Ma et al, 2018 ; Kour, Manhas & Sharma, 2020 ; Khan, 2021 ; Priyadharsini & Sasikala, 2022 ; Peya, Chumki & Zaman, 2021 ; Chaubey et al, 2021 ; Hosseinzadeh et al, 2021 ; Juneja, 2022 ; Kishor & Chakraborty, 2021 ; Islam et al, 2022 ; Saktheeswari & Balasubramanian, 2021 ; Chandel et al, 2016 ; Priya & Manavalan, 2018 ). The UCI dataset is characterized by 7,200 instances and 21 categorical and real attributes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LDA was also adopted by [17], and based on his experiments, the hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism classification accuracy rates reached 99.62%. Similarly, random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and KNN were also applied separately with 98.5% accuracy rates obtained by the RF approach [25]. With the help of machine learning techniques, thyroid disorder can be efficiently detected [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38].…”
Section: Machine Learning Techniques For Thyroid Disease Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Tyagi et al [5] estimated the probable risk of thyroid disease using conventional machine learning classifiers. Researchers in [6] evaluated the potential of machine learning classifiers such as K-Nearest Neighbours (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Random Forest (RF) in the prediction of thyroid disease. Several other researchers collaborated to develop an effective machine learning-based approach for detecting thyroid disease [7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%