A Study on Improvement of Horseback Riding Pants I

Kwon, Sook-Hee

doi:10.5805/sfti.2016.18.3.374

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 7 publications

(2 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In addition, less experienced riders find it difficult to follow the vertical oscillations in the trot, which may lead to the pelvis bouncing in the saddle [ 10 ]. Such movements with unfitted garments, excess movements, or poor coordination can cause friction and even injuries in the area of contact between the body and the saddle, and that is what the equestrian clothing industry is trying to prevent [ 12 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Self-Assessment of the Pelvic Floor by Women Practicing Recreational Horseback Riding

Urbowicz¹,

Saulicz

et al. 2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was to compare the condition of the pelvic floor in women who are involved in regular recreational horseback riding, with both physically active women as well as women not undertaking any recreational physical activity. Taking into account horseback riding and physical activity, 140 healthy women aged 17 to 61 were divided into three groups: women practicing horseback riding (WPHR) (46 persons), physically active women (PAW) (47 persons) and women not physically active (WNPA) (47 persons). The Australian Pelvic Floor Questionnaire (APFQ) was used to measure the extent of pelvic floor dysfunctions in women from all three groups. The lowest average values were found in the group of women practicing recreational horseback riding, and the highest in the group of women not physically active (95% CI: 0.61–1.15 vs. 0.87–1.44 —bladder scores; 0.82–1.32 vs. 1.24–1.8—bowel scores; 0.07–0.33 vs. 0.08–0.35—prolapse of reproductive organs scores; 0.4–1.07 vs. 0.49–1.3—sexual function). Statistically significant intergroup differences were recorded only for the bowel function rate (p = 0.021). The overall pelvic floor dysfunction rate in the WPHR group was lower when compared with both control groups (95% CI: 2.15–3.62 vs. 2.34–3.54 in women from PAW group and vs. 3.0–4.56 in women from WNPA group). Based on this study, it can be concluded that all of the pelvic floor related symptoms, their frequency, and severity levels do not qualify recreational horseback riding as being a risk factor for developing pelvic floor dysfunction in women.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%