2009
DOI: 10.21608/jssae.2009.90295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Study on Harvesting Mechanization of Soybean Crop

Abstract: The experiments were carried out during the agricultural season of 2003 to evaluate two different systems of harvesting soybean crop to choose the most efficient and economic system as well as to determine the optimum operating conditions for both systems. The first system was harvesting soybean crop by combine harvester (Yanmar-CA760) which was tested at four different forward and cylinder speeds under four various levels of grain and straw moisture contents. The second was harvested by hand sickle then thres… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…-1 , which led to a decrease in ton production costs to 48.30 pounds ton -1 , taking into account harvesting the crop at a moisture content of 11.5% to reduce field losses, while adhering to the forward speed to operate the machine used in the harvest. In a study conducted by Gomaa et al (2009) to compare the mechanization of soybean harvesting in Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate using both the combine harvester (total operating width of 243 cm) compared to the manual harvest and the threshing with a traditional threshing machine (the dimensions of the feeding slot 118 x 50 cm) had the lowest cost values for harvest (at grain moisture content of 18.5%) they were 265,901 and 394,129 pounds fed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-1 , which led to a decrease in ton production costs to 48.30 pounds ton -1 , taking into account harvesting the crop at a moisture content of 11.5% to reduce field losses, while adhering to the forward speed to operate the machine used in the harvest. In a study conducted by Gomaa et al (2009) to compare the mechanization of soybean harvesting in Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate using both the combine harvester (total operating width of 243 cm) compared to the manual harvest and the threshing with a traditional threshing machine (the dimensions of the feeding slot 118 x 50 cm) had the lowest cost values for harvest (at grain moisture content of 18.5%) they were 265,901 and 394,129 pounds fed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, depending on the efficiency, harvesting of soybeans with a combine harvester and reaping with reapers and after drying, threshing with threshers at the station are used [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%