2019
DOI: 10.13106/ijidb.2019.vol10.no5.7.
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Study on Factor Analytical Methods and Procedures for PLS-SEM (Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling)

Abstract: Purpose -This study provides appropriate procedures for EFA to help researchers conduct empirical studies by using PLS-SEM. Research design, data, and methodology -This study addresses the absolute and relative sample size criteria, sampling adequacy, factor extraction models, factor rotation methods, the criterion for the number of factors to retain, interpretation of results, and reporting information. Results -The factor analysis procedure for PLS-SEM consists of the following five stages. First, it is impo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Table 3, the Cronbach's alpha values for the measurement model range from 0.702 to 0.886, and the composite reliability values range from 0.835 to 0.930, all of which are above 0.7, which indicates that the internal consistency reliability of the scale indicators of the measurement model is acceptable. The eigenvalues (Eig) of the correlation matrix are another criterion indicating the appropriateness of the measured variable in reflecting the corresponding latent variable [95,101]. According to Sanchez [95], if the first eigenvalue in the correlation matrix is higher than 1 and the second eigenvalue is lower than 1, each group of indicators is in a unidimensional space.…”
Section: Measurement Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Table 3, the Cronbach's alpha values for the measurement model range from 0.702 to 0.886, and the composite reliability values range from 0.835 to 0.930, all of which are above 0.7, which indicates that the internal consistency reliability of the scale indicators of the measurement model is acceptable. The eigenvalues (Eig) of the correlation matrix are another criterion indicating the appropriateness of the measured variable in reflecting the corresponding latent variable [95,101]. According to Sanchez [95], if the first eigenvalue in the correlation matrix is higher than 1 and the second eigenvalue is lower than 1, each group of indicators is in a unidimensional space.…”
Section: Measurement Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the items had good FLs (> 0.50) and low complexity, except for item 15 under the domain ‘perceived risk of heart attack/stroke’, which had low FL (0.26) and communality (0.122) and high complexity (2.06). In addition, almost all items had good communality values ranging from 0.32 to 0.94 [ 17 , 40 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It ought to be relatively easy to understand for the general population in Malaysia regardless of sociodemographic differences. Furthermore, the use of the EFA and CFA provides more robust evidence to support the validity of the factor structure of a measure [ 40 ]. There are limited studies that use the CFA even though the method is proven superior to the EFA and other simple reliability analyses in several respects [ 31 , 49 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are several limitations to this study, the recording of the amount of historical data being the preliminary limitation. With regards to factor analysis, a larger number of samples contribute to more robust results [52]. Comprehensively, as the geographical scope of this study was restricted to district level boundaries, the data pertaining to the collection of long and continuous historical time-series was assiduously challenging in nature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%