2015
DOI: 10.4103/2277-8632.165406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study on association and correlation of lip and finger print pattern analysis for gender identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are in accordance to the studies done by Nagasupriya A et al and Kumaran S et al 17,19 Another study also revealed the loop fingerprint pattern as the most common pattern followed by whorl and arch type in both sexes suggesting an insignificant role of fingerprint in gender identification. 20 In the present study, there was no statistically significant association between lip print pattern and fingerprint pattern which is in accordance with the study by Nandan SRK et al and Negi A et al 1,6 In contrast, other studies reported a significant correlation between lip print pattern and fingerprint pattern. 14,17 The use of the fingerprint pattern has been established in personal identification in forensic science, unlike lip print.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings are in accordance to the studies done by Nagasupriya A et al and Kumaran S et al 17,19 Another study also revealed the loop fingerprint pattern as the most common pattern followed by whorl and arch type in both sexes suggesting an insignificant role of fingerprint in gender identification. 20 In the present study, there was no statistically significant association between lip print pattern and fingerprint pattern which is in accordance with the study by Nandan SRK et al and Negi A et al 1,6 In contrast, other studies reported a significant correlation between lip print pattern and fingerprint pattern. 14,17 The use of the fingerprint pattern has been established in personal identification in forensic science, unlike lip print.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…P ersonal identification is one of the key areas in the forensic sciences. 1 Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) comparisons and fingerprint analyses are techniques employed to ensure reliable identifications in terms of unique identity. There are certain crime scenarios where other supplemental aids like lip prints, palatal rugae patterns and bite marks become necessary since human identification involves a combination of different procedures for individualizing a person.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be explained by the fact that the epidermal ridges of the fingers and palms, as well as the facial structures such as the lips, alveolus, teeth and palate, are formed from ectoderm during the same embryonic period (6-9 weeks) with a somewhat similar genetic background (43). Loop patterns of fingerprints were most predominantly seen in all the ABO blood groups while past studies (44,45) found no or only a weak correlation between them. This again may be due to the small study samples of previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Although the studies correlating and comparing all these three variables are minimal, in a few studies (15,16) significant correlations were found between them. Nandan et al (17) also revealed in his study the weaker but still clear significance of lip prints and fingerprints in gender identification. Moreover, the sample size in previous studies (6,18) was quite small (ranging from 54 to 208).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…15 Nandan et al observed the predominance of plain loop patterns. 16 Nithin et al, in their study of fingerprint classification and gender distribution among the South Indian population, observed that the most frequent pattern of thumb print among the study population was the ulnar loop pattern. 17 In other studies carried out by Reddy 18 and Rastogi and Pillai, 19 it was recorded that whorl pattern of fingerprint predominated in males and loop type in females.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%