2017
DOI: 10.1080/02103702.2016.1263448
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study of writing mechanisms in Spanish primary education children / Estudio de los mecanismos de escritura en niños españoles de Educación Primaria

Abstract: Several studies performed on deep orthography systems reveal variables that influence writing latencies that occur over the course of learning. In transparent orthographies such as Spanish there are very few studies on writing that measure latencies and duration. The aim of this present study was to take a more in-depth look at knowledge of the writing mechanisms used by Spanish children in primary education, by studying the errors, latencies and duration of the writing of words. To do this, sixty children per… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the influence of all these variables on writing performance has been demonstrated across different orthographies (e.g. Bonin & Fayol, 2000 ; Delattre et al, 2006 ; González‐Martín et al, 2017 ; Pinet et al, 2016 ). Therefore, we expected that these variables would have some influence on writing performance.…”
Section: Experiments 1: Spanish and English Monolingualsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the influence of all these variables on writing performance has been demonstrated across different orthographies (e.g. Bonin & Fayol, 2000 ; Delattre et al, 2006 ; González‐Martín et al, 2017 ; Pinet et al, 2016 ). Therefore, we expected that these variables would have some influence on writing performance.…”
Section: Experiments 1: Spanish and English Monolingualsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En relación al primer objetivo, conocer la opinión de los alumnos de Doctorado sobre su propio proceso de escritura científica, se ha obtenido que cerca de un 40% de los investigadores con poca experiencia planifica previamente los textos que escribe y, mayoritariamente, usan para ello un esquema. Este resultado coincide con lo señalado por González-Martín, et al (2017) que observaron que a medida que los investigadores van adquiriendo un mayor bagaje en experiencias de redacción científica su habilidad para planificar y estructurar los textos mejora. Además, más de un 90% de ellos opina que lo más costoso es aportar coherencia y cohesión al texto.…”
Section: Conclusionesunclassified