1969
DOI: 10.1002/1097-4679(196907)25:3<308::aid-jclp2270250326>3.0.co;2-m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study of Weiner's deviant tempo Rorschach signs for the psychodiagnosis of schizophrenia

Abstract: PROBLEM Deviant tempo on the Rorschach test has been suggested as a valid and useful sign in the psychodiagnosis of schizophrenia. (*, a ) Deviant tempo (DT) waR defined by Weiner(') as any one of the following: More responses to (a) card V than to card IV, (b) card V than to card VI, (c) card IX than to card VIII, or (d) card I X than to card X. Briefly, the rationale for these signs is that these comparisons represented "a pathologic variation of association rate marked by alternations of blocking and though… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1990
1990
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the over-all trend was in the predicted direction, 37 out of 81 nonschizophrenics showed all of the indicators, while 17 out of the 84 schizophrenics showed none of the signs. Subsequent tests of the validity of Weiner's measure (as, for example, by Klinger and Roth, 1964;Lambley, 1973;Orme, 1964;Schwartz & Ewert, 1969) failed to support the usefulness of Weiner's notions. Subsequent tests of the validity of Weiner's measure (as, for example, by Klinger and Roth, 1964;Lambley, 1973;Orme, 1964;Schwartz & Ewert, 1969) failed to support the usefulness of Weiner's notions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the over-all trend was in the predicted direction, 37 out of 81 nonschizophrenics showed all of the indicators, while 17 out of the 84 schizophrenics showed none of the signs. Subsequent tests of the validity of Weiner's measure (as, for example, by Klinger and Roth, 1964;Lambley, 1973;Orme, 1964;Schwartz & Ewert, 1969) failed to support the usefulness of Weiner's notions. Subsequent tests of the validity of Weiner's measure (as, for example, by Klinger and Roth, 1964;Lambley, 1973;Orme, 1964;Schwartz & Ewert, 1969) failed to support the usefulness of Weiner's notions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%