A Study of using AHP Method to Evaluate the Criteria and Attribute of Defects in Heritage Building

Zuraidi, Siti Nor Fatimah; Rahman, Mohammad Ashraf Abdul; Akasah, Zainal Abidin

doi:10.1051/e3sconf/20186501002

Cited by 12 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 9 publications

(11 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…AHP, has been utilized in numerous studies to identify, analyze and prioritize research criteria. For example, Zuraidi et al . (2018) evaluated defects in heritage buildings and prioritized the identified criteria using AHP.…”

Section: Pre-design Pre-construction Stage Factors: Missing Link In C...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…AHP, has been utilized in numerous studies to identify, analyze and prioritize research criteria. For example, Zuraidi et al (2018) evaluated defects in heritage buildings and prioritized the identified criteria using AHP. Hatefi and Tamo saitien_ e (2018) analyzed building projects based on sustainable development criteria using fuzzy AHP and advanced gray relational analysis (GRA).…”

Section: Analytic Hierarchy Process (Ahp) In Soliciting An Expert's J...mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Pre-design CSFs (critical success factors) of building projects for Dubai's development boom

Abdalla

Mushtaha

Rashid

et al. 2023

BEPAM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThis paper aims to identify the pre-design critical success factors CSFs pertaining to different types of construction projects in the rapidly growing city of Dubai, by adopting one of the multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) tools, analytic hierarchy process (AHP).Design/methodology/approachA mapping process was utilized to filter and categorize CSFs gathered from a literature review. A total of 5 main and 27 sub-main criteria were derived following RIBA's Plan of Work 2020 (Royal Institute of British Architects). A questionnaire was distributed among experts in the construction industry to assess the development in vicinity of the Sheikh Zayed Road (SZR). An analysis was conducted to prioritize the CSFs as per experts' judgment.FindingsAccording to the experts' combined judgment, CSFs linked to client requirements (CR) are the most significant at 22.9% priority weight. Overall project review (OPR), project team (PT), project preparation (PP), previous projects feedback and experience (PPF) success factors achieved 21.4, 19.5, 18.9 and 17.2%, respectively. Within CR, sub-CSFs of client consultation and acceptance (CCA), responsibly matrix for stakeholders (RM), client track record (CTR) and client level of service (CLS) were prioritized by the experts.Research limitations/implicationsThis work was carried out by respondents based in UAE only, and focused on one urban stretch of Dubai, this could be replicated by employing experts from other countries and other case study areas within Dubai.Practical implicationsThis study would significantly have an impact on the education of current and future project managers, planners, engineers, architects and, most importantly, decision-makers on helpful pre-design strategies for enhancing their project success. This research could assist, direct and educate management, as the management provides/manages the necessary resources for projects. Furthermore, management also has the authority to choose project leaders/consultants that will make the project successful.Social implicationsConsolidating Dubai's phenomenal growth requires prioritizing socio-economic strategies in future development projects at the pre-design and pre-construction stage, which will improve the city's business environment and the quality of life for Dubai's residents. This opens up fresh possibilities over the next few years for integrating robust procedures for successful execution, monitoring and evaluation of future construction developments from the outset.Originality/valueAlthough many studies have identified various factors as important for successful building projects, few appear to have done a complete analysis using pre-design criteria to systematically categorize professional views on the relative relevance of CSFs. There is a lack in research examining the factors that led to Dubai's successful construction projects. This study attempts to bridge this gap and provide a prioritized framework reference model to assist project/asset managers and decision-makers.

show abstract

Section: Pre-design Pre-construction Stage Factors: Missing Link In C...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Analytic Hierarchy Process (Ahp) In Soliciting An Expert's J...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Pre-design CSFs (critical success factors) of building projects for Dubai's development boom

Abdalla

Mushtaha

Rashid

et al. 2023

BEPAM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…6. The maximu size of the ST 41 steel specimen used is 4,5 mm x 22,28 mm as a determination of the value of the score in the calculation of the paired matrix, the thing that needs to be followed is the subjective value must be in accordance with the important score standard that is fundamental to a variable [10]. Very important evidence for one activity from another activity…”

Section: Identifying Function Values Based On Criteria Andmentioning

confidence: 99%

Implementation of Value Engineering in Heat Treatment Process to Cooling Media Steel ST 41 at PT. XY

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Value engineering analyzes the value and function for optimal results and the condition of the steel material remains consistent according to its quality function. ST 41 steel is a steel classified as low carbon steel with an alloy composition of 0.37-0.43%C, 0.5-0.35%Si, 0.60-0.90%Mn. Heat treatment in this study uses temperatures up to 7230C with temperature holding for one hour, while the proposed alternative cooling media used are salt water, coconut oil, and oil using the holding time of each cooling medium, namely 5 minutes, 10 minutes to 15 minutes. Cooling using 3 media simultaneously is very ineffective and very expensive. The right solution to eliminate unnecessary costs, this research proposes salt water media as a good medium for performance and relatively low cost compared to other media tested. The analysis that occurs from the calculation of the value engineering cost is IDR 45,500,000.00 the heating process in 1 month produces 5000 specimens per day, which can save costs of IDR 15,750,000.00. Thus, the brine medium is able to provide criteria for the speed of the cooling process properly and provide good quality results for a continuous process.

show abstract

“…This method is based on hierarchically structuring the components of the problem, in addition to assigning numerical values to all the variables and factors that are taken into consideration. Applying AHP method requires setting a goal or objective, determining the criteria for evaluation, and finally choosing the alternatives [32], [33]. In this research, the objective is evaluating complex buildings in terms of wayfinding, while the criteria adopted is the list of the architectural design variables affecting indoor wayfinding.…”

Section: Design Of the Evaluation Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluating the Legibility of Complex Buildings: A Quantitative Model for Indoor Wayfinding

Ahmed

Taha

Hasan

2020

WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Wayfinding presents a significant aspect in architectural design since it is associated with the spatial organization and the legibility of indoor environments. It is believed that the physical characteristics of the indoor environment influence the performance of individuals in finding their way in complex settings. Navigation in such buildings can be a distressing process if the needed spatial information is not clearly presented to users; hence, it is important during the design phase to consider the factors that affect users' wayfinding performance. This paper examines these factors in indoor environments and focuses on the design variables that influence their legibility. Furthermore, it attempts to develop a quantitative evaluation model that assesses wayfinding in complex buildings in terms of their architectural design variables, through assigning weights of importance to these variables. For the purpose of implementing and testing the evaluation model, two case studies were conducted in shopping centers in Cairo, Egypt. The performance of users during the study was found to be consistent with the results of the evaluation model. This suggests that the assigned weights of the design variables were rather logical. These weights help in defining the design priorities for wayfinding: building configuration and its complexity are regarded as the first priority, followed by architectural differentiation, visual accessibility, and lastly, landmarks.

show abstract

A Study of using AHP Method to Evaluate the Criteria and Attribute of Defects in Heritage Building

Cited by 12 publications

References 9 publications

Pre-design CSFs (critical success factors) of building projects for Dubai's development boom

Pre-design CSFs (critical success factors) of building projects for Dubai's development boom

Implementation of Value Engineering in Heat Treatment Process to Cooling Media Steel ST 41 at PT. XY

Evaluating the Legibility of Complex Buildings: A Quantitative Model for Indoor Wayfinding

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About