2016
DOI: 10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i47/101747
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Study of Traditional and Surrounding Gate MOSFET using TCAD Simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When compared to ISFET, DMFET performed the best in terms of detecting both charged and neutral biomolecules [11]. Scaling MOSFETs became perilous as CMOS technology was scaled down to ever smaller nodes, causing MOS devices to encounter critical issues related to Short Channel Effects (SCEs) with poor gate control [12][13][14][15]. Advances in material-based technology that improve semiconductor devices by using graphene, plasmonic techniques, metamaterials, nanoparticles, and negative capacitance for improving materialistic properties such as energy bandgap controlling, quantum well introduction, and the production of ferroelectric domains for use in next generation ICs have piqued the interest of researchers in specific fields [16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When compared to ISFET, DMFET performed the best in terms of detecting both charged and neutral biomolecules [11]. Scaling MOSFETs became perilous as CMOS technology was scaled down to ever smaller nodes, causing MOS devices to encounter critical issues related to Short Channel Effects (SCEs) with poor gate control [12][13][14][15]. Advances in material-based technology that improve semiconductor devices by using graphene, plasmonic techniques, metamaterials, nanoparticles, and negative capacitance for improving materialistic properties such as energy bandgap controlling, quantum well introduction, and the production of ferroelectric domains for use in next generation ICs have piqued the interest of researchers in specific fields [16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%