A Study of Thought Disorder in Paranoid and Non-Paranoid Schizophrenia

Mazumdar, P.K.; Chaturvedi, Santosh K.; Gopinath, P. S.

doi:10.1159/000284710

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 2 publications

(5 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…A simple thought-disordered versus non-thought-disordered grouping of schizophrenic participants has been used in a number of previous semantic priming investigations. However, thought disorder is a highly state-dependent clinical symptom that is not specific to schizophrenia nor to clinical subtypes of schizophrenia (Mazumdar, Chaturvedi, & Gopinath, 1991). It is also difficult to operationalize and reliably measure thought disorder (definitions of thought disorder vary among investigators as do the methods of determining the presence and degree of thought disorder).…”

Section: Clinical Characteristics Of Schizophrenia Patientsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Automatic versus controlled semantic priming in schizophrenia.

Ober¹,

Vinogradov

Shenaut

1997

Neuropsychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Schizophrenic individuals (n = 31), including paranoid and nonparanoid diagnostic subgroups, and normal controls (n = 20) participated in a semantic priming experiment involving a single-choice lexical decision task. For the automatic priming blocks, a 260-ms stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) was used; for the controlled priming blocks, 1,000-ms SOA was used. The paranoid subgroup showed significantly less priming than did the control group. The nonparanoid subgroup showed a decrease in priming compared with the control group that approached significance. There was an increased priming effect for the controlled compared with the automatic priming condition; this difference was not modulated by participant group. Nonsignificant semantic priming (equal to 0) occurred only for schizophrenic subgroups and only in automatic priming conditions.

show abstract

Section: Clinical Characteristics Of Schizophrenia Patientsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Automatic versus controlled semantic priming in schizophrenia.

Ober¹,

Vinogradov

Shenaut

1997

Neuropsychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Las seis dimensiones encontradas en nuestro estudio abarcan una gama más amplia de diagnósticos, en los que se incorporan categorías polémicas, como el trastorno esquizofreniforme, el esquizoafectivo y el delirante, que algunos autores no diferencian netamente del síndrome esquizofrénico (34). Otro hallazgo relacionado con la estructura factorial tiene que ver con la identificación de un grupo de síntomas que configuran las formas clásicas de paranoia, en la cual los síntomas de ansiedad, irritabilidad y agresividad se relacionan con temas delirantes, generalmente de tipo persecutorio (35).…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

Análisis de la estructura del síndrome psicótico agudo

Gerardo

Ricardo

Luis

2012

Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Despite von Dormarus's princple, the idea that normal thought processes are at work in delusion without necessarily postulating a specific logic of delusional thought has increasingly caught on [26][27][28]. In his wide-ranging review of the literature on thought disorders in delusional perception, Cutting [29] has emphasized the nonspecificity of mechanisms like overinclusion.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Whatever Happened to Delusional Perception?

Monti¹

1998

Psychopathology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Thanks to the analysis of delusional perception’s formal binary structure, generations of psychiatrists believed that the problem of delusion, at least from a descriptive point of view, had been resolved. The first-rank Schneiderian symptoms, and delusional perception in particular, had become reference points for the diagnosis of delusion and schizophrenia. Today, however, the phenomenon of delusional perception no longer seems to be taken into serious consideration by psychiatrists and psychopathologists. The crisis of the nosographic specificity of Schneiderian first-rank symptoms and the development of a transnosographic perspective in the study of delusion have definitively loosened the ties that existed in traditional psychopathology between delusional perception, delusion and schizophrenia. Despite the fact that delusional perception has lost its fundamental role in the nosographic sector, it still maintains its importance when studied in an interpersonal context. The significance of formal discontinuity evident in delusional perception authorized the psychiatrist to pause on the threshold of delusion without making allowances for the disastrous lack of comprehension so typical of delusional perception, which in turn must be studied from an interpersonal perspective, not as if it were an aseptic object in a laboratory. The therapeutic relationship can therefore provide an opportunity to recuperate those experiences which the patient was unable to store in his memory and concentrated in delusional perception.

show abstract

A Study of Thought Disorder in Paranoid and Non-Paranoid Schizophrenia

Cited by 4 publications

References 2 publications

Automatic versus controlled semantic priming in schizophrenia.

Automatic versus controlled semantic priming in schizophrenia.

Análisis de la estructura del síndrome psicótico agudo

Whatever Happened to Delusional Perception?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About