“…Although studies have not analyzed the rhetorical organization (text structure) of science tests, the styles of rhetorical organization used in the texts of science learning (the TLU domain) have been examined. In science learning, students are often expected to produce and comprehend explicit procedure recounts and/or research articles (Halliday & Webster, 2004;Honig, 2010;Jackson, Meyer, & Parkinson, 2006;Reeves, 2005), arguments with claim and evidence (Lemke, 1990;National Research Council, 2012;Naylor et al, 2007;Reeves, 2005), explanations Halliday & Webster, 2004;National Research Council, 2012;Schleppegrell, 2004), descriptions (Arnold, 2012;Bailey et al, 2004;Honig, 2010;Schleppegrell, 1998), and comparisons (Arnold, 2012;Bailey et al, 2004;. Therefore, if students are not expected to make meaning from argumentation and explanation texts on science tests, this may suggest that these assessments suffer from construct underrepresentation.…”