2002
DOI: 10.1086/343771
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Study of the Type II-Plateau Supernova 1999[CLC]gi[/CLC] and the Distance to its Host Galaxy, NGC 3184

Abstract: We present optical spectra and photometry sampling the first 6 months after discovery of supernova (SN) 1999gi in NGC 3184. SN 1999gi is shown to be a Type II-plateau event with a photometric plateau lasting until about 100 days after discovery. Using the expanding photosphere method (EPM), we derive a distance to SN 1999gi of 11:1 þ2:0 À1:8 Mpc and an explosion date of 1999 December 5:8 þ3:0 À3:1 , or 4:1 þ3:0 À3:1 days prior to discovery. This distance is consistent with a Tully-Fisher distance recently deri… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
55
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
6
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3, where we also plotted the magnitude estimate by Kloehr on discovery images and the upper limit reported by Yamaoka & Itagaki (2005). The light curves appear typical for type IIP SN, this being evident from comparison with the light curves of SN 1999gi (Leonard et al 2002b). We shifted the light curves of SN 1999gi along the time axis to reach the best agreement for the stage of rapid decline after the plateau, and it is Rich (2005), the "v" mark is the upper limit from Yamaoka & Itagaki (2005).…”
Section: Observations and Reductionsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…3, where we also plotted the magnitude estimate by Kloehr on discovery images and the upper limit reported by Yamaoka & Itagaki (2005). The light curves appear typical for type IIP SN, this being evident from comparison with the light curves of SN 1999gi (Leonard et al 2002b). We shifted the light curves of SN 1999gi along the time axis to reach the best agreement for the stage of rapid decline after the plateau, and it is Rich (2005), the "v" mark is the upper limit from Yamaoka & Itagaki (2005).…”
Section: Observations and Reductionsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Although this relation is not universal and has shown some violations (for example, Leonard et al, 2002c;Patat et al, 2011, and references therein) but it is still valid for general investigation purpose.…”
Section: Extinction Due To the Milky Way And The Host Galaxymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For 25 SNe we estimate this quantity by measuring the peak wavelength of the narrow emission lines resulting from the superposed H ii region (e.g., Leonard et al 2002b). For the other 22 SNe the aforementioned emission line is not detected, so we adopt the redshift of the host galaxy nucleus, while for SN 1991al, SN 1999em, and SN 2004dj we adopt the values from Hamuy (2001), Leonard et al (2002a), and Vinkó et al (2006), respectively.…”
Section: Calibration Of the Photospheric Magnitudementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the host galaxy of SN 2005ay (NGC 3938) we adopt the Cepheid distance for NGC 3982 which, like NGC 3938, is a member of the Ursa Major Group. In the case of SN 1999gi, the distance of its host galaxy (NGC 3184) is estimated through Cepheid distances for NGC 3319 and NGC 3198, which Tully (1988) cataloged in a small group of four galaxies, although NGC 3184 is a relatively isolated galaxy (Leonard et al 2002b). Table 3 shows the name and distance modulus of the host galaxy of the four aforementioned SNe II.…”
Section: Photospheric Magnitude For Sne IImentioning
confidence: 99%