2009
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/17/006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study of the timing properties of position-sensitive avalanche photodiodes

Abstract: In this paper we study position-dependent timing shifts and timing resolution in position sensitive avalanche photodiodes (PSAPDs) and their effect on the coincidence window used in positron emission tomography (PET) systems using these devices. There is a delay in PSAPD signals that increases as the excitation position moves from the corner to the center of the device and the timing resolution concurrently worsens. The difference in timing between the center and corner can be up to 30.7 ns for a 14×14 mm2 are… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The PS-SSPM timing results, from both the 10 mm PS-SSPM and 5 mm PS-SSPM designs studied in this work, share many similarities with timing results obtained with PS-APDs [14], [15]. The timing shift across the surface of the PS-SSPM sensing area is of similar magnitude to that measured with PS-APDs, though it is important to note the device area; in terms of distance from center to corner the 5 mm PS-SSPM has a shift of 7.1 ns/mm, the 10 mm PS-SSPM a shift of 2.9 ns/mm, and a 14 mm PS-APD for comparison has a shift of 2.5 ns/mm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The PS-SSPM timing results, from both the 10 mm PS-SSPM and 5 mm PS-SSPM designs studied in this work, share many similarities with timing results obtained with PS-APDs [14], [15]. The timing shift across the surface of the PS-SSPM sensing area is of similar magnitude to that measured with PS-APDs, though it is important to note the device area; in terms of distance from center to corner the 5 mm PS-SSPM has a shift of 7.1 ns/mm, the 10 mm PS-SSPM a shift of 2.9 ns/mm, and a 14 mm PS-APD for comparison has a shift of 2.5 ns/mm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…2, where the cathode channel was fed directly into an Ortec 579 fast filter amplifier and the four corner anode channels were amplified by Cremat CR-113 preamplifiers before further amplification and shaping with a CAEN n568B spectroscopy amplifier (shaping time 100 ns). The setup for time stamp generation was similar to the publication of Wu 2009 [14], using an Ortec 584 for constant fraction (CF) or leading edge (LE) time pick off and an Ortec 416A gate and delay generator to adjust the trigger delay for the digitization using a simultaneously sampled DAQ board (UEI, Inc., Walpole, MA) [17]. For full pulse digitization of the raw detector signals a 2.4 GHz bandwidth oscilloscope (Tectronics, DPO 7254) with 40 Gs/sec sampling rate was used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Timing resolution was compared using the different capacitor values. For each capacitor value, the timing resolution was quantified in several ways by post processing of the data using a 200 keV lower energy threshold, by applying an energy window of 400 - 650 keV, and with and without a crystal timing shift calibration [18]. The timing shift calibration corrects for the position- dependent offsets in pulse arrival time due to the resistive readout of the PS-SSPM.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, one pincushion distorted flood was tested (Wu et al, 2009), shown in Figure 3-22. Since there is only one of these floods no statistical data is available and this section merely serves as a proof of concept for floods with similar distortions.…”
Section: Pin Cushion Distortion Floodsmentioning
confidence: 99%