2010
DOI: 10.1177/0018726709348932
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study of the relationship between exit, voice, loyalty and neglect and commitment in India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
64
2
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
64
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, managers are shown to prefer centralized decision making and practice tight control and do not like to delegate authority (e.g., Debroux et al, 2012). This practices often results in the exploitation of employees who tend not to raise their voice against ill-treatment and poor management practices (e.g., Mellahi et al, 2010;Malek et al, 2014). Such set-ups generally result in organizational ineffectiveness and inefficiencies and all of this creates massive challenges for the HR function.…”
Section: Work-life Balance and Internal Labor Marketsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, managers are shown to prefer centralized decision making and practice tight control and do not like to delegate authority (e.g., Debroux et al, 2012). This practices often results in the exploitation of employees who tend not to raise their voice against ill-treatment and poor management practices (e.g., Mellahi et al, 2010;Malek et al, 2014). Such set-ups generally result in organizational ineffectiveness and inefficiencies and all of this creates massive challenges for the HR function.…”
Section: Work-life Balance and Internal Labor Marketsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We adopted the qualitative method because the exploratory nature of the study requires in-depth information. It is also a response to the calls for more qualitative studies on issues related to employee commitment, voice, exit, and conflict management (e.g., Antcliff & Saundry, 2009;Dickens, Hall, & Wood, 2005;Mellahi, Budhwar, & Li, 2010). Access to respondents was gained via professional associations, practitioners' seminars and conferences, and EMBA alumni.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is respect for hierarchy as well as personalized relationships and the management style is typically paternalistic and employees see the organization as a symbolic representation of a family (Aycan et al 2000). In such cultures, employees seek to maintain a long lasting and harmonious working relationship with their organizations (Mellahi et al 2010) with their organizations. Given these societal characteristics, one would expect that a study examining psychological contract of employees with their organizations, their psychological ownership and tendency to go beyond the call of their duty would be strong (Krishnan and Singh 2010).…”
Section: The Indian Cultural Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%