1984
DOI: 10.1080/0158791840050209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study of the relationship between telephone contact and persistence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both tutorials at the study centres and the telephone sessions are optional. Scales (1984) found a statistically significant correlation, r = +27(p < .05), between the number of calls between tutor and student and the number of assignments completed in a distance learning course. Sweet (1986) found direct telephone contact between faculty and students significantly influenced student commitment and persistence.…”
Section: Heather J Persons and Michael J Catchpolementioning
confidence: 86%
“…Both tutorials at the study centres and the telephone sessions are optional. Scales (1984) found a statistically significant correlation, r = +27(p < .05), between the number of calls between tutor and student and the number of assignments completed in a distance learning course. Sweet (1986) found direct telephone contact between faculty and students significantly influenced student commitment and persistence.…”
Section: Heather J Persons and Michael J Catchpolementioning
confidence: 86%
“…Typical of the interest in the low completion rates of many distance education students are relatively recent studies by Kember (1981), Shale (1982), Scales (1984), Roberts (1984), Thompson (1984) and the recent re-publication (in 1984) of the aforementioned Rekkedal study. A review of this latter study revealed the major conclusion that it was quite likely that drop-out rates can be lowered by reducing turn-around time (1984: 250).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Likewise, some studies simply examined factors without a conceptual framework (Scales, 1984), while others attempted to understand the phenomenon in the context of general distance education theories unrelated to attrition (Eisenberg & Dowsett, 1990;Roberts, 1984). A year before Kember published his model, Billings (1988) …”
Section: Distance Education and Student Dropout: Kember (1989)mentioning
confidence: 99%