1973
DOI: 10.1016/0030-4220(73)90148-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study of the radiographic appearance of osseous defects on panoramic and conventional films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

1979
1979
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple investigators have found that the radiographic detection of experimental periapical lesions depends on the visualization of destruction of the bony cortex adjacent to the tooth (Duinkerke et al, 1975;Manson-Hing, 1971;Phillips and Shawkat, 1973;Bender and Seltzer, 1961 a and b;Schwartz and Foster, 1971). The recent availability of xeroradiography (Jeromin et al, 1980;Gratt et al, 1980 b) and Kodak Ektaspeed film (Silha, 1981 a and b) offers the possibility that either of these alternative imaging systems might offer diagnostic sensitivity either the same as or greater than that of Kodak Ultraspeed film for the radiographic detection of periapical lesions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Multiple investigators have found that the radiographic detection of experimental periapical lesions depends on the visualization of destruction of the bony cortex adjacent to the tooth (Duinkerke et al, 1975;Manson-Hing, 1971;Phillips and Shawkat, 1973;Bender and Seltzer, 1961 a and b;Schwartz and Foster, 1971). The recent availability of xeroradiography (Jeromin et al, 1980;Gratt et al, 1980 b) and Kodak Ektaspeed film (Silha, 1981 a and b) offers the possibility that either of these alternative imaging systems might offer diagnostic sensitivity either the same as or greater than that of Kodak Ultraspeed film for the radiographic detection of periapical lesions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Simulated bone lesions have been widely used to compare radiological techniques for bone observation 5,17,20,21,22,24,29 , and are already in use to test the accuracy of CBCT protocols 23 . Pinsky, et al 23 (2006) used simulated lesions to test linear measurements in CBCT, but they made 4-8-mm defects, which are larger than those prepared in the present work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the examinations can be disturbed by serious artifacts caused by metallic fillings in teeth 2,6,16,18,19,25,27,30 . Many authors have already used simulated bone lesions in the jaws to compare conventional radiographic techniques 5,17,22 , and also more recently in singleslice CT 20,21,24 and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) 23 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if intraoral films appear to be more accurate, Gòmez‐Romàn et al (1996, 1999) found no significant difference in the accuracy of measurement between these techniques. Oba & Katayama (1972) and Phillips & Shawkat (1973) even suggest that panoramic radiographs might be preferable. Moreover, Gòmez‐Romàn et al (1999) demonstrated that measurements aided by digital image processing methods are reliable and achieve a higher degree of precision than the visual metric method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%